Previous clinical trials have examined doses of transdermal nicotine substantially higher than the standard 21 -mg dose. Although these trials have demonstrated that higher doses of transdermal nicotine are safe, compared with the standard dose of transdermal nicotine (21 mg), higher doses (42 mg) do not generally result in higher smoking cessation rates ( Fiore et al., 2008 ;Stead et al., 2008 ). However, no clinical trial of high dose transdermal nicotine has targeted smokers who are fast metabolizers of nicotine. As a next step toward improving response rates to transdermal nicotine by considering smoker ' s interindividual variability in nicotine metabolism, we conducted this proof of concept study to evaluate the differential effi cacy of Abstract Introduction: Smokers with a faster rate of nicotine metabolism, estimated using the ratio of 3 Ј -hydroxycotinine (3-HC) to cotinine, have lower plasma nicotine levels and are more likely to relapse with 21 mg nicotine patch therapy, than smokers with slower rates of nicotine metabolism. Thus, faster metabolizers of nicotine may require a higher nicotine patch dose to achieve cessation.Methods: This proof of concept randomized placebocontrolled trial evaluated the effi cacy and safety of 8 weeks of 42 mg transdermal nicotine versus 21 mg, among 87 fast metabolizers of nicotine (3-HC/cotinine ≥ 0.18).Results: After 1 week of treatment, an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed that participants treated with 42 mg nicotine had signifi cantly higher expired-air carbon monoxide (CO)-confi rmed 24-hr abstinence (75% vs. 58.1%; OR = 3.21; 95% CI : 1.12 -9.24, p = .03) but not 7-day abstinence (50% vs. 34.9%; OR = 2.02; 95% CI : 0.82 -4.94, p = .13). After 8 weeks of treatment, ITT analysis showed that participants treated with 42 mg nicotine had marginally higher rates of CO-confi rmed 24-hr abstinence (45.5% vs. 30.2%; OR = 2.32; 95% CI : 0.92 -5.92, p = .08) but not 7-day abstinence (29.6% vs. 23.3%; OR = 1.52, 95% CI : 0.57 -4.07, p = .41). Percent nicotine and cotinine replacement were signifi cantly greater for 42 mg nicotine versus 21 mg ( p < .005). There were no signifi cant differences between treatment arms in the frequency of severe side effects and serious adverse events or blood pressure during treatment ( p > .10).
Conclusions:Further examination of the effi cacy of 42 mg nicotine patch therapy for fast metabolizers of nicotine is warranted.