2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2014.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are generic and brand-name statins clinically equivalent? Evidence from a real data-base

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, price competition can be achieved when coordinated demand and supply-side policies are considered [8]. Care is not compromised with demonstrated bioequivalence between generics and originators [1,2,[52][53][54]. Supply-side measures such as price cutting are relatively easy to implement in Korea but the lack of demand-side measures appears insufficient to create a competitive market.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Overall, price competition can be achieved when coordinated demand and supply-side policies are considered [8]. Care is not compromised with demonstrated bioequivalence between generics and originators [1,2,[52][53][54]. Supply-side measures such as price cutting are relatively easy to implement in Korea but the lack of demand-side measures appears insufficient to create a competitive market.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…successful switching of patients between higher priced patented and generic statins to save considerable resources without compromising care [18][19][20][21]. Cost considerations are increasingly important especially with the growing prevalence of non-communicable diseases including diabetes, hypertension, and obesity and generic statins priced as low as 2% to 4% of pre-patent loss prices in some countries [3,[22][23][24] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The competition between brand-name drugs and generics is becoming fiercer than ever before in the world, especially with the increase of newly approved generics in developing countries. Although domestic drugs (i.e., generics) have been verified bioequivalence to the originator (imported-joint venture drugs) in many published studies (Paton, 2006; Sakshaug et al, 2007; Kesselheim et al, 2008, 2010; Corrao et al, 2014a,b; Gagne et al, 2014; Lessing et al, 2014; Martin et al, 2014), quite a lot of patients in China still prefer brand-name drugs. Compared with the situation in China, foreign countries have different attitudes to generic drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%