2015
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are fetuses that fail to achieve their growth potential at increased risk of intrapartum compromise?

Abstract: Objective The true growth potential of a fetus is difficult to predict but recently a new definition, independent of fetal weight, using cerebroplacental (cerebro-umbilical) ratio (CPR)<

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
87
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Global screening performance of the CPR 10th centile was highest for CS IFC (AUROC 0.72), followed by birthweight <5th centile, birthweight Data presented as n (%) or median (IQR), as appropriate. CPR, cerebroplacental ratio; meconium liquor, meconium-stained liquor; FHR abnormalities, fetal heart rate suspicious or pathological; SVD, spontaneous vaginal delivery; IFC, intrapartum fetal compromise; CS, cesarean section; IOL excl, induction of labour cases excluded; BW, birthweight; abnormal cord gases, umbilical artery pH ≤7.0 and/or base excess ≤-12 and/or lactate >6 mmol/L; low Apgar, Apgar score ≤5 at 5 min; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; composite ANO, composite adverse neonatal outcome (abnormal cord gases [umbilical artery pH ≤7.0, base excess ≤-12 and/or lactate >6 mmol/L], Apgar score ≤5 at 5 min, and/or NICU admission Although low birthweight is associated with late-onset growth restriction and intrapartum and neonatal complications [21][22][23], some babies born with birthweights above the 10th centile may have failed to reach their growth potential [11,24] and are therefore also at risk of these complications. In our view, a 41.9% sensitivity for birthweight <10th centile based on CPR <10th centile may be reasonable and acceptable, given the imperfect presumption of birthweight as a reliable indicator of underlying placental insufficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global screening performance of the CPR 10th centile was highest for CS IFC (AUROC 0.72), followed by birthweight <5th centile, birthweight Data presented as n (%) or median (IQR), as appropriate. CPR, cerebroplacental ratio; meconium liquor, meconium-stained liquor; FHR abnormalities, fetal heart rate suspicious or pathological; SVD, spontaneous vaginal delivery; IFC, intrapartum fetal compromise; CS, cesarean section; IOL excl, induction of labour cases excluded; BW, birthweight; abnormal cord gases, umbilical artery pH ≤7.0 and/or base excess ≤-12 and/or lactate >6 mmol/L; low Apgar, Apgar score ≤5 at 5 min; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; composite ANO, composite adverse neonatal outcome (abnormal cord gases [umbilical artery pH ≤7.0, base excess ≤-12 and/or lactate >6 mmol/L], Apgar score ≤5 at 5 min, and/or NICU admission Although low birthweight is associated with late-onset growth restriction and intrapartum and neonatal complications [21][22][23], some babies born with birthweights above the 10th centile may have failed to reach their growth potential [11,24] and are therefore also at risk of these complications. In our view, a 41.9% sensitivity for birthweight <10th centile based on CPR <10th centile may be reasonable and acceptable, given the imperfect presumption of birthweight as a reliable indicator of underlying placental insufficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] There is now good data, both from prospective [15,16] and retrospective studies [17,18] demonstrating that a low CPR is associated with suboptimal growth at term, increased rates of intrapartum compromise and emergency caesarean, poor condition at birth and increased rates of neonatal unit admission. In addition, a low CPR may also reflect a failure of a fetus to reach its genetic growth potential at term [19,20] despite having a normal birth weight.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst fetal growth restriction (FGR) and SGA are often used interchangeably, SGA is more broadly defined as any fetus with an estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 10th centile for gestation. Not all cases of FGR are SGA, and, indeed, there is increasing recognition that even fetuses with EFWs >10th centile may have failure to reach their genetic growth potential and that these fetuses are characterised by an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%