“…Global screening performance of the CPR 10th centile was highest for CS IFC (AUROC 0.72), followed by birthweight <5th centile, birthweight Data presented as n (%) or median (IQR), as appropriate. CPR, cerebroplacental ratio; meconium liquor, meconium-stained liquor; FHR abnormalities, fetal heart rate suspicious or pathological; SVD, spontaneous vaginal delivery; IFC, intrapartum fetal compromise; CS, cesarean section; IOL excl, induction of labour cases excluded; BW, birthweight; abnormal cord gases, umbilical artery pH ≤7.0 and/or base excess ≤-12 and/or lactate >6 mmol/L; low Apgar, Apgar score ≤5 at 5 min; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; composite ANO, composite adverse neonatal outcome (abnormal cord gases [umbilical artery pH ≤7.0, base excess ≤-12 and/or lactate >6 mmol/L], Apgar score ≤5 at 5 min, and/or NICU admission Although low birthweight is associated with late-onset growth restriction and intrapartum and neonatal complications [21][22][23], some babies born with birthweights above the 10th centile may have failed to reach their growth potential [11,24] and are therefore also at risk of these complications. In our view, a 41.9% sensitivity for birthweight <10th centile based on CPR <10th centile may be reasonable and acceptable, given the imperfect presumption of birthweight as a reliable indicator of underlying placental insufficiency.…”