Are Emissions Trading Policies Sustainable? A Study of the Petrochemical Industry in Korea

Abstract

In 2015, Korea inaugurated an emissions trading scheme (ETS). In this regard, many studies have considered the sustainable performance and efficiency of industries that emit carbon; however, few have examined ETS at company level. This paper focuses on companies' data related to Korean ETS in the petrochemical industry. Based on the non-radial, nonparametric directional distance function (DDF), the paper evaluates the governance factors related to ETS policies and sustainable performance in terms of carbon technical efficiency (CTE), the shadow price of carbon emissions, and Morishima elasticity between the input and undesirable output of carbon emissions. Using a dual model, the paper shows that Korean ETS has huge potential for participating companies to improve CTE. If all companies consider the production possibility frontier, they could potentially improve efficiency by 52.8%. Further, Morishima elasticity shows strong substitutability between capital and energy, implying that green technology investment should bring a higher degree of energy-saving performance. Unfortunately, however, the market price of carbon emissions is far too low compared with its shadow price, suggesting that the Korean government's price-oriented market intervention has resulted in the ETS producing poor sustainable performance. As the title suggests, ETS of Korea is not sustainable at the current stage, but with more efforts on the transition period, all the developing countries should support the governance factors of the ETS in terms of the more effective green investment with easier access to the green technology.

A Study on the Sustainable Performance of the Steel Industry in Korea Based on SBM-DEA

“…Thus, each firm should make efforts to enhance their own competitiveness for their sustainable performance. Of course, this kind of scale upgrading may require higher emissions targets and, thus, the government should promote a balanced green investment of the covered companies between enhanced efficiency and newly-added responsibility [26]. It is noteworthy that upgrading the scale may not only arise from green investment, but also from organizational culture and/or behavioral changes in the private sectors.…”

“…Energy and GHG data were taken from the Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center of Korea. Since there are no individual CO 2 data available for each Korean firm, Choi and Lee [26] …”

Sustainable Governance in Northeast Asia: Challenges for the Sustainable Frontier

“…To establish the feasibility of this ETS policy, Choi and Lee analyzed its sustainable governance factors in terms of carbon technical efficiency, the shadow price of carbon emissions, and Morishima elasticity for green investment, using the non-radial directional distance function [9]. Unfortunately, they found that the market price of carbon emissions is far too low compared with its shadow price, suggesting that the Korean government's price-oriented market intervention has resulted in poor performance, at least in its initial stage [9].…”

Environmental Performance Evaluation of the Korean Manufacturing Industry Based on Sequential DEA

“…In order to evaluate this biased effect on manufacturing sub-industries, we use individual company-level data and their emission volumes in this field. To the best of our knowledge, very few studies [4,7,8] have used these data up to now. For this perspective, in this research, recent company-level data is used.…”