Are electronic diaries useful for symptoms research? A systematic review

Burton, Christopher; Weller, David; Sharpe, Michael

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.12.022

Cited by 82 publications

(87 citation statements)

References 46 publications

(45 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…117 Research participants find electronic symptom diaries acceptable and can generate valid symptom data. 118 During the exploratory phase, initial feasibility testing, we refined the diary recording for the needs of the trial.…”

Section: Primary Outcomementioning

confidence: 99%

Facet joint injections for people with persistent non-specific low back pain (Facet Injection Study): a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

Ellard

Underwood

Achana

et al. 2017

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2009 guidelines for persistent low back pain (LBP) do not recommend the injection of therapeutic substances into the back as a treatment for LBP because of the absence of evidence for their effectiveness. This feasibility study aimed to provide a stable platform that could be used to evaluate a randomised controlled trial (RCT) on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of intra-articular facet joint injections (FJIs) when added to normal care.ObjectivesTo explore the feasibility of running a RCT to test the hypothesis that, for people with suspected facet joint back pain, adding the option of intra-articular FJIs (local anaesthetic and corticosteroids) to best usual non-invasive care is clinically effective and cost-effective.DesignThe trial was a mixed design. The RCT pilot protocol development involved literature reviews and a consensus conference followed by a randomised pilot study with an embedded mixed-methods process evaluation.SettingFive NHS acute trusts in England.ParticipantsParticipants were patients aged ≥ 18 years with moderately troublesome LBP present (> 6 months), who had failed previous conservative treatment and who had suspected facet joint pain. The study aimed to recruit 150 participants (approximately 30 per site). Participants were randomised sequentially by a remote service to FJIs combined with ‘best usual care’ (BUC) or BUC alone.InterventionsAll participants were to receive six sessions of a bespoke BUC rehabilitation package. Those randomised into the intervention arm were, in addition, given FJIs with local anaesthetic and steroids (at up to six injection sites). Randomisation occurred at the end of the first BUC session.Main outcome measuresProcess and clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes included a measurement of level of pain on a scale from 0 to 10, which was collected daily and then weekly via text messaging (or through a written diary). Questionnaire follow-up was at 3 months.ResultsFifty-two stakeholders attended the consensus meeting. Agreement informed several statistical questions and three design considerations: diagnosis, the process of FJI and the BUC package and informing the design for the randomised pilot study. Recruitment started on 26 June 2015 and was terminated by the funder (as a result of poor recruitment) on 11 December 2015. In total, 26 participants were randomised. Process data illuminate some of the reasons for recruitment problems but also show that trial processes after enrolment ran smoothly. No between-group analysis was carried out. All pain-related outcomes show the expected improvement between baseline and follow-up. The mean total cost of the overall treatment package (injection £419.22 and BUC £264.00) was estimated at £683.22 per participant. This is similar to a NHS tariff cost for a course of FJIs of £686.84.LimitationsPoor recruitment was a limiting factor.ConclusionsThis feasibility study achieved consensus on the main challenges in a trial of FJIs for people with persistent non-specific low back pain.Future workFurther work is needed to test recruitment from alternative clinical situations.Trial registrationEudraCT 2014-000682-50 and Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN93184143.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 30. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

show abstract

Section: Primary Outcomementioning

confidence: 99%

Facet joint injections for people with persistent non-specific low back pain (Facet Injection Study): a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

Ellard

Underwood

Achana

et al. 2017

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recent literature has featured studies that evaluate the particular functionalities of smartphones, including an assessment of the use of on-board digital diaries in symptom research [11], short message service (SMS) usage in behavior change management [12], in sexual health education [13], and in improving the adherence of patients to antiretroviral treatment [14]. A comparison of mobile phone records usage against conventional paper-based records in controlled drug trials has been performed by one study [15].…”

Section: A Healthcare and Smartphone Usementioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Affecting the Readiness of Medical Doctors and Patients with Chronic Conditions toward the Usage of Smartphones in the Saudi Arabian Healthcare Sector

Al-Mahadeen

2015

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Numerous studies have reported the rapid increase in the number of individuals who use smartphones. However, smartphones appear to be increasingly used by healthcare workers, particularly physicians and nurses. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the readiness of medical doctors and patients with chronic conditions in using and adopting smartphones for communication. This study employs the Technology Acceptance Model to examine the behavior of people in using smartphones from the perspectives of trust and rural areas. To realize our objective, we conducted a questionnaire survey that involved medical doctors and patients with chronic conditions. Our particular focus was Al Qunfudhah City in Saudi Arabia. More than 200 questionnaires were distributed to people belonging to different healthcare sectors in the rural areas of Al Qunfudhah City. Our aim was to include every possible scenario and to obtain excellent perspectives. The results that we eventually analyzed indicated that trust factor and rural areas significantly influence the readiness of people belonging to the healthcare sector toward using smartphones. The results of our study concur with the findings of other studies. Our results indicate that smartphones and other high-technology gadgets are now necessary and accepted devices in the different healthcare fields. However, further studies should explore the challenges and effects of smartphone use in the healthcare sector.

show abstract

“…It is also decreasing the number of the missing responses by obligating the patients to answer before proceeding to the next question (Caro et al, 2001). Compared to the paper versions, the electronic pain self-report questionnaires and electronic diaries are offering considerable advantages: 1) completeness of data (Hanscom et al, 2002); 2) entered data are date and time stamped (Burton et al, 2007); 3) saving of time and reduction of errors from entering written data manually to the database for the analysis Ryan et al, 2002. During the Painvision project (www.painvision.be), a digital scale was developed for data collection.…”

Section: Electronic Pain Observational Scales (Assessment Scales)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-Invasive Methods for Monitoring Individual Bioresponses in Relation to Health Management

Exadaktylos¹,

Berckmans²,

Aerts³

2011

Health Management - Different Approaches and Solutions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Are electronic diaries useful for symptoms research? A systematic review

Cited by 82 publications

References 46 publications

Facet joint injections for people with persistent non-specific low back pain (Facet Injection Study): a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

Facet joint injections for people with persistent non-specific low back pain (Facet Injection Study): a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

Factors Affecting the Readiness of Medical Doctors and Patients with Chronic Conditions toward the Usage of Smartphones in the Saudi Arabian Healthcare Sector

Non-Invasive Methods for Monitoring Individual Bioresponses in Relation to Health Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About