2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are electric self-balancing scooters safe in vehicle crash accidents?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The friction coefficient for the ESS wheels against the ground is also set as 0.3. The models, along with the parameters, have been applied in previous studies [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The friction coefficient for the ESS wheels against the ground is also set as 0.3. The models, along with the parameters, have been applied in previous studies [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 50th percentile male pedestrian model of MADYMO human database [ 27 ] is chosen as the ESS rider human model for the process of vehicle ESS contact. The validated pedestrian model [ 28 ] is widely used in vehicle VRU accident simulations and analysis [ 6 , 22 ] to predict the injury and capture the kinematic response. Both solowheel and doublewheel ESS riders were set as standing posture, as shown in Figure 1(a) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The research found that majority of the injuries to occupants are a result of secondary collisions between occupants and other objects [ 17 19 ]. The occupant secondary collision means that the injury is caused by the contact with the interior of the vehicle [ 20 22 ]. The head injury is the most investigated traffic injury, and the head injury criterion (HIC) is the most commonly used injury index to passengers [ 20 – 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%