2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are effects of emotion in single words non-lexical? Evidence from event-related brain potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

16
127
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
16
127
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Post-lexical processing is suggested to be necessary to elicit concreteness effects (West & Holcomb, 2000). Indeed, concreteness is typically found to modulate ERP results from 250 to 300 ms onwards (Barber, Otten, Kousta, & Vigliocco, 2013;Kanske & Kotz, 2007;Palazova, Manthill, Sommer, & Schacht, 2011), just as in the current study. By contrast, sensorimotor and DLPFC activity occurred earlier, at 165 and 228 ms respectively.…”
Section: Onwardssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Post-lexical processing is suggested to be necessary to elicit concreteness effects (West & Holcomb, 2000). Indeed, concreteness is typically found to modulate ERP results from 250 to 300 ms onwards (Barber, Otten, Kousta, & Vigliocco, 2013;Kanske & Kotz, 2007;Palazova, Manthill, Sommer, & Schacht, 2011), just as in the current study. By contrast, sensorimotor and DLPFC activity occurred earlier, at 165 and 228 ms respectively.…”
Section: Onwardssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Emotional modulations of the P1 are repeatedly reported in visual word recognition (Bayer et al, 2012;Ortigue et al, 2004;Palazova, Mantwill, Sommer, & Schacht, 2011;Rellecke, Palazova, Sommer, & Schacht, 2011;Sass et al, 2010;Scott, O'Donnell, Leuthold, & Sereno, 2009) and are also known from picture processing studies (see Olofsson, Nordin, Sequeira, & Polich, 2008). Inconsistencies in the direction of these modulations should be attributed to methodological issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It has been previously argued that the degree of linguistic processing modulates the direction of attention to the affective content during word processing reflected in the EPN (Hinojosa et al, 2010;Kissler et al, 2007;Schacht & Sommer, 2009b). Thus, it could be argued that only minimal linguistic processing as in passive reading tasks will lead to faster lexical access as compared to elaborate lexical-semantic processing required in previous studies using a similar task (Palazova et al, 2011;Schacht & Sommer, 2009a,b). Consequently, the EPN latency will be longer when more elaborate and effortful linguistic processing is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%