2020
DOI: 10.1007/s41542-020-00065-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Counter-Productive Workplace Behaviors and Workplace Deviance Parallel Constructs? A Meta-Analytic Test of a Common Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a theoretical perspective, WD is a part of the larger umbrella term of Counterproductive Work Behaviors (CWB) that includes behavioral sets such as bullying or retaliatory actions (Mackey et al, 2021). In this respect, workplace deviance is unique because it involves actions that violate organizational norms, meaning they are behaviors that are uncommon and frowned upon (Thrasher et al, 2020). For example, WD includes acts such as stealing from colleagues, falsifying receipts for personal gain, or using illegal drugs or consuming alcohol on the job.…”
Section: General Mental Ability and Workplace Deviant Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a theoretical perspective, WD is a part of the larger umbrella term of Counterproductive Work Behaviors (CWB) that includes behavioral sets such as bullying or retaliatory actions (Mackey et al, 2021). In this respect, workplace deviance is unique because it involves actions that violate organizational norms, meaning they are behaviors that are uncommon and frowned upon (Thrasher et al, 2020). For example, WD includes acts such as stealing from colleagues, falsifying receipts for personal gain, or using illegal drugs or consuming alcohol on the job.…”
Section: General Mental Ability and Workplace Deviant Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will pave the way for their moral disengagement (Lee et al, 2016). Such moral disengagement may harm the organization (e.g., counterproductive workplace behaviors, sabotage behaviors, silence, and unethical workplace behaviors) (Vigoda-Gadot, 2006, 2007Shao et al, 2008;Moore et al, 2012;Heald, 2017;Thrasher et al, 2020;Zhuang, 2021). Given our arguments above, we posit that:…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence indicates that deviant behavior by employees is related to profit loss for organizations (Detert et al, 2007), and the direct and indirect costs of workplace deviance have been estimated to be in the billions for the United States economy alone (e.g., National Retail Foundation, 2018;Needleman, 2008). Workplace deviance can be divided into subdimensions based on the target of the deviant behaviors: the organization or its employees (Bennett & Robinson, 2000;Thrasher et al, 2020). Organizational workplace deviance refers to behaviors that undermine the success of the organization, such as stealing, damaging company property, or leaving work early without permission.…”
Section: Workplace Deviancementioning
confidence: 99%