2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are cooperatives the weakest link in European banking? A non-parametric metafrontier approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of papers have analysed small credit institutions focusing on performance (Goddard et al, 2008a;Kontolaimou and Tsekouras, 2010), diversification (Goddard et al, 2008b;Lepetit et al, 2008;Mercieca et al, 2007, Mckillop andWilson, 2011), risk of failure (Fiordelisi and Mare, 2013) and ownership structure (Gorton and Schmid, 1999 (Hesse and Cihák, 2007;Ayadi et al, 2010) providing empirical evidence that cooperative banks are more stable than commercial banks as they have a great deal of soft information (which is hard to collect) on the creditworthiness of members/customers, and therefore less likely to make lending mistakes. Furthermore, size appears to be positively related to systemic risk (Vallascas and Keasey, 2012;De Jonghe, 2010) and the majority of cooperative banks are small rural credit institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of papers have analysed small credit institutions focusing on performance (Goddard et al, 2008a;Kontolaimou and Tsekouras, 2010), diversification (Goddard et al, 2008b;Lepetit et al, 2008;Mercieca et al, 2007, Mckillop andWilson, 2011), risk of failure (Fiordelisi and Mare, 2013) and ownership structure (Gorton and Schmid, 1999 (Hesse and Cihák, 2007;Ayadi et al, 2010) providing empirical evidence that cooperative banks are more stable than commercial banks as they have a great deal of soft information (which is hard to collect) on the creditworthiness of members/customers, and therefore less likely to make lending mistakes. Furthermore, size appears to be positively related to systemic risk (Vallascas and Keasey, 2012;De Jonghe, 2010) and the majority of cooperative banks are small rural credit institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, cooperative banks are different from commercial banks and their stability is influenced by different factors 4 . Recent studies have focused on productive performance related to the technological development (Kontolaimou and Tsekouras, 2010), the performance and risk depending on the ownership structure (Iannotta et al, 2007) and cost efficiency and financial structure . Second, competition is likely to be one of the key factors influencing banking stability, but its influence is probably different for commercial and cooperative banks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…however the importance of properly accounting for heterogeneity has been highlighted in a handful of recent studies (Bos and Schmiedel, 2007;Kontolaimou and Tsekouras, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very interesting to notice that the meta-frontier approach has not yet been applied in the automobile-industry related research though it has been employed in many fields in the past decade such as Bos & Schmiedel (2007), Chen & Song (2008), Matawie & Assaf (2008) Kontolaimou & Tsekouras (2010), Lin (2011), Mariano et al (2011), and Chen & Yang (2011. This highlights the significance of applying the meta-frontier approach to scrutinize the efficiency of global automakers from an unexplored perspective.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%