2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we use these results to form and indicator function and then to estimate the time-varying combinations, following equation (6). Finally, we evaluate the performance of the proposed time-varying composite forecasts.…”
Section: Conditional Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we use these results to form and indicator function and then to estimate the time-varying combinations, following equation (6). Finally, we evaluate the performance of the proposed time-varying composite forecasts.…”
Section: Conditional Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the general conclusions, Canina and Figlewski [16] examined volatility implied in S&P 100 index options from 1983 to 1987 and suggested that implied volatility is a poor indicator of subsequently realized volatility. Becker and Clements [17] indicated that combinations of various model-based forecasts of S&P 500 realized volatility outperformed its implied volatility index-VIX. Outside of the US, recent empirical findings were mixed and suggested a slight lead of implied volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting type of benchmark that could be considered is models for the realized volatility or a combination of such models, see e.g. Becker and Clements (2008). Parameter estimates and standard errors for these three models are given in the last six columns of Table 4.…”
Section: Benchmark Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%