2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-018-3844-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Children Severely Affected by Autism Spectrum Disorder Underrepresented in Treatment Studies? An Analysis of the Literature

Abstract: Despite significant advances in autism research, experts have noted that children severely affected by autism spectrum disorder (ASD) appear to have been understudied. Rigorous analysis of this observation has been limited, and the representation of severity has not been well-described. We assessed three domains of severity (communication ability, cognitive functioning, and adaptive functioning) in 367 treatment studies of children with ASD published 1991–2013. We found that the proportion of studies that incl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
46
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Child factors that were commonly measured were those that were potential moderators and were likely assessed to characterize the sample and/or for inclusion/exclusion criteria and included ASD characteristics, cognition, and adaptive behavior. Consistent with broader intervention reviews [e.g., Stedman, Taylor, Erard, Peura, & Siegel, 2018], we likewise found a mixture of measures used to characterize the sample impacting on the ability to both characterize and compare samples and evaluate moderators/mediators. Across studies, mixed results were found, which may reflect at least in part the use of these same variables (e.g., nonverbal cognition restricted to >12 months, Green et al, 2010) for inclusion/exclusion criteria restricting the variance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Child factors that were commonly measured were those that were potential moderators and were likely assessed to characterize the sample and/or for inclusion/exclusion criteria and included ASD characteristics, cognition, and adaptive behavior. Consistent with broader intervention reviews [e.g., Stedman, Taylor, Erard, Peura, & Siegel, 2018], we likewise found a mixture of measures used to characterize the sample impacting on the ability to both characterize and compare samples and evaluate moderators/mediators. Across studies, mixed results were found, which may reflect at least in part the use of these same variables (e.g., nonverbal cognition restricted to >12 months, Green et al, 2010) for inclusion/exclusion criteria restricting the variance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Furthermore, continuing to include measures of hypothesized change mechanisms (e.g., changes in parent behavior) may be of value in determining at what level of generalization an intervention is effective (e.g., if parent behavior did not change it may explain nonsignificant results) and as well as the active ingredients (e.g., parent change in synchrony with child). Taken together, these findings suggest the need for both greater analysis of the impact of moderators typically collected to characterize samples with more systematic selection (as per calls by Stedman et al, 2018 for more consistent characterizations of samples), collection of theoretically driven putative moderators beyond measures to characterize samples, along with the consideration of broader measurement of potential mediators at both the child and family levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our initial focus on aggression in more severely affected youth with ASD addresses critical gaps in the literature. Despite their apparent increased vulnerability to developing serious problem behaviors (Kanne & Mazurek, 2011), those more severely affected by ASD are underrepresented in intervention research [Stedman, Taylor, Erard, Peura, & Siegel, ]. Furthermore, it is common for this subpopulation to require high levels of intensive intervention (e.g., specialized school placements, psychopharmacology, and in‐home behavioral therapies), which often exceed what providers in community settings can offer [Joshi et al, ; Siegel et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children with autism who are non-verbal or minimally verbal are often excluded from research [27], and children with severe communication impairments are less likely to be included in treatment studies [28]. Point OutWords was developed with the inclusion of clients with autism both explicitly by asking children to choose amongst graphical design options and by obtaining therapists' feedback on their behalf, and implicitly by observing children's preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%