2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are busy boards detrimental?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
197
1
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 425 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
21
197
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Fich and Shivdasani (2006) find that busy directors are less effective, and Adams and Ferreira (2008) show that outside directorships increase board meeting attendance problems. By contrast, Field et al (2013), Ferris et al (2003), and Larker et al (2013) find a positive influence of busy directors. In addition, Kroll et al (2008) find that director experience on other boards is positively related to acquisition outcomes.…”
Section: Board Of Director Experiencementioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fich and Shivdasani (2006) find that busy directors are less effective, and Adams and Ferreira (2008) show that outside directorships increase board meeting attendance problems. By contrast, Field et al (2013), Ferris et al (2003), and Larker et al (2013) find a positive influence of busy directors. In addition, Kroll et al (2008) find that director experience on other boards is positively related to acquisition outcomes.…”
Section: Board Of Director Experiencementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Directors that are too busy with other board duties may not be able to devote enough time to their task of monitoring and advising executives (Fich and Shivdasani, 2006). However, some research finds a positive impact of busy directors (Field et al, 2013;Larker et al, 2013). The propensity of being busy also is a function of a person's qualification to serve on other boards.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regard to the diligence or service of the boards, Ferris, Jagannathan, and Pritchard (2003), Harris and Shimizu (2004) and Field, Lowry, and Mkrtchyan (2013) support the notion that busy directors (where many directors hold board seats in multiple firms) can fulfill their governance responsibility effectively. However, some studies demonstrate that busy boards may not effectively monitor management (Fich & Shivdasani, 2006;Jiraporn, Singh, & Lee, 2009b).…”
Section: Board Member Characteristics and Real Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Vafeas (1999) argued that board meetings frequency may increase when the number of outside directorships held by independent board members increases. Several studies showed that the accumulation of many outside directorships may enhance the knowledge of directors and their experience (Ghosh, 2007;Cook and Wang, 2011;Field et al, 2013). However, although they are considered competent (Vafeas, 1999;Di Pietra et al, 2008;Pombo and Gutiérrez, 2011), directors holding multiple directorships may have difficulties to attend some regular board meetings (Booth and Deli, 1996;Laksmana, 2008;Jiraporn et al, 2009a).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a large literature has focused on the concept of multiple directorships of directors and its relationships with internal and external characteristics of the firm and with some attributes of directors (Ahn et al, 2010;Lee and Lee, 2012;Field et al, 2013). In this framework, several theoretical and empirical studies (Sarkar and Sarkar, 2009;Frye and Wang, 2010;Pathak and Sun, 2013) highlighted the advantages of increasing the number of directorships held by directors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%