2016
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are batterers different from other criminals? An fMRI study

Abstract: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a complex and global phenomenon that requires a multi-perspective analysis. Nevertheless, the number of neuroscientific studies conducted on this issue is scarce as compared with studies of other types of violence, and no neuroimaging studies comparing batterers to other criminals have been conducted. Thus, the main aim of this study was to compare the brain functioning of batterers to that of other criminals when they are exposed to IPV or general violence pictures. An fMRI … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
21
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(46 reference statements)
6
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, brain differences have been found when comparing batterers with other criminals. In a group of batterers, Bueso-Izquierdo et al (2016) found similar patterns of brain activity to those reported by Lee et al (2008Lee et al ( , 2009 in emotional areas and areas of the default mode network (DMN) when they were watching IPV images. Moreover, some studies have also reported structural brain differences between batterers and other criminals (Verdejo-Roma´n et al, 2019), although these differences are not related to the presence of brain damage (Bueso-Izquierdo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, brain differences have been found when comparing batterers with other criminals. In a group of batterers, Bueso-Izquierdo et al (2016) found similar patterns of brain activity to those reported by Lee et al (2008Lee et al ( , 2009 in emotional areas and areas of the default mode network (DMN) when they were watching IPV images. Moreover, some studies have also reported structural brain differences between batterers and other criminals (Verdejo-Roma´n et al, 2019), although these differences are not related to the presence of brain damage (Bueso-Izquierdo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The observation of a specific pattern of brain functioning in batterers has also been found in other studies. Bueso-Izquierdo et al (2016) found that batterers, compared with other criminals, showed activation of the medial prefrontal cortex, the PCC, and the left angular gyrus when they saw images of IPV, but not of GV. Verdejo-Roma´n et al (2019) have also found lower volume in the areas related to emotional processing compared with other delinquents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Research has investigated perpetrators of IPV, using MRI to identify changes in brain activity and structure that may influence the propensity for committing IPV, including evidence that reduced DMN activation suggests perpetrators do not view IPV-related decisions towards their partners as a moral conflict ( Marín-Morales et al, 2020 ), a higher ratio of dorsal/ventral medial prefrontal cortex reactivity gradient is indicative of increased aggression in IPV perpetration ( Chester and DeWall, 2019 ), perpetrators exhibit differential activation of the cingulate and prefrontal cortices in response to IPV imagery ( Bueso-Izquierdo et al, 2016 ), and may have structural deficits in the amygdala ( Zhang et al, 2013 ), with alterations in cortical gray matter thickness among perpetrators of IPV ( Verdejo-Román et al, 2019 ). It is crucial to identify how we can improve the quality of care for existing and future survivors of IPV by increasing awareness and further emphasizing the importance of screening for TBI among at-risk individuals to improve health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imaging results were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Alphasim thresholding approach implemented in SPM REST toolbox [37]. This method is one of the most used in neuroimaging [38][39][40]. To determine whether a cluster of significant results is corrected for multiple comparisons, the Alphasim tool run Monte Carlo simulations to calculate the minimum cluster extent required based in a previously selected p-value.…”
Section: Threshold Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%