2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Assumptions about the Model Type Necessary in Reaction-Diffusion Modeling? A FRAP Application

Abstract: At present, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) data are interpreted using various types of reaction-diffusion (RD) models: the model type is usually fixed first, and corresponding model parameters are inferred subsequently. In this article, we describe what we believe to be a novel approach for RD modeling without using any assumptions of model type or parameters. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to address both model-type and parameter uncertainties in inverting FRAP data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time constant (τ) of recovery or spread correlates with junctional permeability 9 . Limitations include the interpretation of time constants, which is neither standardized nor absolute; the extraction of τ, which depends on the mathematical model used 13,14 ; the use of dyes of different molecular weight and diffusion rate, which can lead to different time constants for the same model 15 and the results of which need to be calibrated. The benefit of these methods is their applicability to a multicellular setting, unlike the dual-cell patch clamp.…”
Section: Existing Methods For Assessment Of Intercellular Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time constant (τ) of recovery or spread correlates with junctional permeability 9 . Limitations include the interpretation of time constants, which is neither standardized nor absolute; the extraction of τ, which depends on the mathematical model used 13,14 ; the use of dyes of different molecular weight and diffusion rate, which can lead to different time constants for the same model 15 and the results of which need to be calibrated. The benefit of these methods is their applicability to a multicellular setting, unlike the dual-cell patch clamp.…”
Section: Existing Methods For Assessment Of Intercellular Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murine hepatoma cells (Hepa1c1c7, LGC Standards GmbH, Wesel, Germany) and GFP-AhR expressing cells ("Tet-Off System" previously described in [29]) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (Biochrom AG, Berlin, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Biochrom), 1% L-alanyl-L-glutamine (Biochrom), and 1% penicillin/ streptomycin (Biochrom). To prevent GFP-AhR expression, medium was supplemented with 5 mg/ml tetracycline (Tet).…”
Section: Cell Culture Of Hepa1c1c7 Cell Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter estimation step consists in fitting this data with a ‘suitable’ model, but since the recovery portion typically can be fit with a sum of time-dependent exponential terms (Mai et al 2011), this leaves wide latitude as to what underlying processes are to be included, and once that is fixed, what meaning can be ascribed to those parameters. Traditionally FRAP experiments were used for cellular or sub-cellular level processes that occur on short time scales, and by fitting parameters such as diffusion coefficients and binding rates to the data, properties of cell- or sub-cellular-level processes could be inferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%