2000
DOI: 10.1080/10168730000080001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Americans More Altruistic Than the Japanese? A U.S.-JAPAN Comparison of Saving and Bequest Motives *

Abstract: In this paper, we analyze a variety of data on saving motives, bequest motives, and bequest division from the "Comparative Survey of Savings in Japan and the United States," a binational survey conducted in 1996 by the Institute for Posts and Telecommunications Policy of the Ministry of Posts andTelecommunications of the Government of Japan, in order to shed light on which model of household behavior applies in the two countries. We find (1) that the selfish life cycle model is the dominant model of household … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We investigate the role of TFP growth and demographics for the future course of the national saving rate using a computable general equilibrium model as in Auerbach and Kotlikoff (1987). Our model maintains the life‐cycle hypothesis of Modigliani and Brumberg (1954), a choice motivated by recent findings of Hayashi (1995), Horioka et al (2000), and Horioka (2002). Hayashi (1995) estimates Engel curves for Japanese households and finds that they are inconsistent with the hypothesis that bequest motives are important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We investigate the role of TFP growth and demographics for the future course of the national saving rate using a computable general equilibrium model as in Auerbach and Kotlikoff (1987). Our model maintains the life‐cycle hypothesis of Modigliani and Brumberg (1954), a choice motivated by recent findings of Hayashi (1995), Horioka et al (2000), and Horioka (2002). Hayashi (1995) estimates Engel curves for Japanese households and finds that they are inconsistent with the hypothesis that bequest motives are important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Hayashi (1995) estimates Engel curves for Japanese households and finds that they are inconsistent with the hypothesis that bequest motives are important. Horioka et al (2000) argue, more generally, that survey evidence of Japanese households is much more consistent with the life‐cycle hypothesis than the alternatives of altruistic or dynastic households. In a model populated by overlapping generations (OLG) of life‐cycle consumers, demographic changes such as the aging of a baby boom generation, lower fertility, and increased longevity can cause significant changes in the national saving rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…, 2000). People often save primarily for retirement and other unforeseeable events in their life course, therefore, some surveys on bequest motives suggest much of the bequests are not necessarily planned but are either accidental or unintended (Horioka et al. , 2000).…”
Section: Post‐war Accumulation Of Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Horioka et al. () and Horioka (, ) find that the proportion of respondents planning to leave a larger share of their bequest to children who provide more care is much higher in Japan than in the United States (29.2% in Japan vs. 3.1% in the United States in the case of Horioka et al., , and Horioka, , and 20.5% in Japan vs. 2.5% in the United States in the case of Horioka, ). These results also suggest that the strategic bequest (exchange) motive is much more applicable in Japan than it is in the United States (see also Horioka, , ).…”
Section: Survey Of Previous Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%