2014
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2014.927133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are alliances a panacea for SMEs? The achievement of competitive priorities and firm performance

Abstract: This study aims to investigate how competitive priorities relate to firm performance. With the inclusion of strategic alliances, its mediating effect is examined for SMEs in Taiwan. The magnitude and significance of these relationships were assessed by the path of an analytic approach. We used surveys of SMEs in high technology electronics industries. There were totally 73 samples collected. The results show that quality and flexibility priorities can improve firm performance. Cost priority can influence the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After a relevant development by the academia for more than three decades (Skinner, 1996), there is now a commonly accepted definition of the manufacturing-strategy (Hung et al, 2014): "Manufacturing strategy is the effective use of manufacturing strengths as a competitive weapon for the achievement of business and corporate goals "…”
Section: Manufacturing Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After a relevant development by the academia for more than three decades (Skinner, 1996), there is now a commonly accepted definition of the manufacturing-strategy (Hung et al, 2014): "Manufacturing strategy is the effective use of manufacturing strengths as a competitive weapon for the achievement of business and corporate goals "…”
Section: Manufacturing Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the business environment is rapidly changing because of enhancing global inter-connectivity, growing demand for innovation (Raymond et al, 2014;Lau et al, 2013) and technology (Rahman, 2001;Kleindl, 2000), new product development (Bruch et al, 2014;Schrettle et al, 2014;Sonia and Francisca, 2005). The need of the hour is for innovation (Raymond et al, 2014;Lau et al, 2013;Yam et al, 2011;Rahman, 2001), effective technologies (Liu, 2013), manufacturing flexibility (Hung et al, 2014, Vokurka et al, 2000, and reconfiguration of capabilities on the manufacturing sectors (Chengen, 2000). The future of globalization and manufacturing competitiveness is being driven by new markets for new products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the variations in terminology, there is broad agreement among OM researchers on using at least four primary dimensions of OS which include the following competitive priorities: cost, quality, delivery and flexibility (Swamidass and Newell, 1987;Ferdows and De Meyer, 1990;Kim and Lee, 1993;Vickery et al, 1993;Ward et al, 1995;White, 1996;Boyer and Lewis, 2002;Größler and Grübner, 2006;Acquaah et al, 2011;Hung et al, 2015;Jabbour et al, 2012;Schoenherr et al, 2012;Hallgren et al, 2011, Cai andYang, 2014). However, given the imperatives of global competition, some authors have recently added new competitive capabilities (e.g.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although there have been several studies linking OS to FP (e.g. Swamidass and Newell, 1987;Vickery et al, 1993;Amoako-Gyampah and Boye, 2001;Christiansen et al, 2003;Peng et al, 2011;Hung et al, 2015), there is a lack of understanding about the industry environment which serves as an important antecedent of FP. Drawing on a relatively large sample of manufacturing firms operating in a wide variety of industries, the present study aims to provide further evidence to relatively scant empirical research (Swamidass and Newell, 1987;Ward et al, 1995;Badri et al, 2000) by examining the effects of environmental dynamism (ED) on both OS and FP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study carried out by Hung et al (2015), it is stated that cost efficiency, product quality, flexibility, and better delivery are four dimensions of competitive advantage. Moreover, alliances are a source to achieve strategic resources and network sources, resulting in the entrance of SMEs into competitiveness and ultimately they bring long-term benefit leading to the superior performance of these firms.…”
Section: Strategic Alliance and Competitive Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%