The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01571.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are all seeds equal? Spatially explicit comparisons of seed fall and sapling recruitment in a tropical forest

Abstract: Understanding demographic transitions may provide the key to explain the high diversity of tropical tree communities. In a faunally intact Amazonian forest, we compared the spatial distribution of saplings of 15 common tree species with patterns of conspecific seed fall, and examined the seed-to-sapling transition in relation to locations of conspecific trees. In all species, the spatial pattern of sapling recruitment bore no resemblance to predicted distributions based on the density of seed fall. Seed effici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
79
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(38 reference statements)
4
79
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the presence of an intact community of animal dispersers appears critical for seeds to escape the effects of NDD [3]. If loss of animal-mediated seed dispersal results in seed deposition near or beneath the parent crown, as seems likely for Miliusa, very few seeds would be likely to escape NDD, because the scale of NDD can be tens of metres greater than the crown radius of the parent tree [26]. Theoretical models for spatial plant population dynamics show that lower population size is a predictable consequence of decreasing the scale of seed dispersal relative to the scale of NDD [52]; our empirical study shows that this theoretical prediction is relevant to tropical forest conservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the presence of an intact community of animal dispersers appears critical for seeds to escape the effects of NDD [3]. If loss of animal-mediated seed dispersal results in seed deposition near or beneath the parent crown, as seems likely for Miliusa, very few seeds would be likely to escape NDD, because the scale of NDD can be tens of metres greater than the crown radius of the parent tree [26]. Theoretical models for spatial plant population dynamics show that lower population size is a predictable consequence of decreasing the scale of seed dispersal relative to the scale of NDD [52]; our empirical study shows that this theoretical prediction is relevant to tropical forest conservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), seedling densities increase with distance from parental plants, indicating that distanceand density-dependent processes may affect recruitment in this early stage like expected from the Janzen-Connell model. This supports the importance of seed dispersal for recruitment at this early stage (Hyatt et al 2003;Swamy et al 2011). However, the density of later stages is not affected by distance from parental plants up to 20 m, suggesting that mortality related to distance from parents affect especially early stages at this spatial scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Thus dispersal enhances the per capita likelihood of recruitment (Harms et al 2000;Hyatt et al 2003;Swamy et al 2011;Terborgh 2013). Distanceand density-dependent mechanisms, as those predicted by Janzen-Connell hypothesis, seem to be pervasive in tropical tree communities (Harms et al 2000;Swamy et al 2011). However, the role of those processes that influences plant recruitment in small forest fragments is not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A frequência de coletores contendo algum propágulo de M. euosma diminuiu com o aumento da distância da planta matriz, corroborando a hipótese da densidade dependente da distância de Janzen-Connell (Janzen, 1970;Howe & Smallwood, 1982;Francisco & Galetti, 2001;Swamy et al, 2011). Porém, na comparação com diferentes tipos de propágulos, observaram-se comportamentos distintos entre frutos imaturos, frutos maduros e sementes.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified