2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are air travellers willing to pay for reducing or offsetting carbon emissions? Evidence from Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is much lower than elicitations that relied on stated-preferences, as could be expected based on criticisms associated with hypothetical measures of intentions and the environmental attitude-behavior gap. In fact, a substantial share of the bookings in our sample could have been offset at a cost lower than the average willingness-to-pay elicited by recent hypothetical studies in countries with comparable purchasing power (at least 83% compared to the average of 30 EUR/tonCO2 elicited by Rotaris et al, 2020 2 shows a detailed overview of the willingnesses-to-pay elicited in the three studies mentioned and which quantile they represent in our respective sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is much lower than elicitations that relied on stated-preferences, as could be expected based on criticisms associated with hypothetical measures of intentions and the environmental attitude-behavior gap. In fact, a substantial share of the bookings in our sample could have been offset at a cost lower than the average willingness-to-pay elicited by recent hypothetical studies in countries with comparable purchasing power (at least 83% compared to the average of 30 EUR/tonCO2 elicited by Rotaris et al, 2020 2 shows a detailed overview of the willingnesses-to-pay elicited in the three studies mentioned and which quantile they represent in our respective sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Third, we look at the role of income. Research suggests that pro-environmental behavior increases with rising income levels (Blasch & Farsi, 2014;Choi, 2015;Denstadli & Veisten, 2020;Fatihah & Rahim, 2017;Jou & Chen, 2015;Rotaris et al, 2020;Seetaram et al, 2018;Shaari et al, 2020) 1 . Conceptually, this can be related to the extension of the low-cost hypothesis (Diekmann & Preisendörfer, 1998) regarding income, i.e.…”
Section: Pre-registered Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that a carbon tax can generate a desired shift if high-speed rail is readily available as an environmentally friendly alternative to air transport (Prussi & Lonza, 2018). Rotaris et al (2020) provide a good review of the studies on WTP for voluntary and mandatory contributions for reducing or offsetting carbon emissions. About half of these studies examine the WTP for a flight (e.g., Lu & Shon, 2012) while the other studies focus on the WTP per tonne of CO2 (e.g., MacKerron et al, 2019).…”
Section: Doddsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geographic focus of most of the existing literature on voluntary offsets is Europe (e.g., Brouwer et al, 2008;Blasch & Farsi, 2014) with a few papers on the Asia-Pacific region, including Australia (e.g., Choi & Ritchie, 2014;Choi et al, 2018;Shaari et al, 2020). Rotaris et al (2020) and Denstadli and Veisten (2020) pointed out that most studies focus on the WTP for the voluntary contribution for air travel emissions reduction while studies estimating the WTP for mandatory taxation schemes are small in number. The former is important to airlines while the latter is of interest to policy makers.…”
Section: Doddsmentioning
confidence: 99%