2010
DOI: 10.1186/1749-8546-5-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are acupoints specific for diseases? A systematic review of the randomized controlled trials with sham acupuncture controls

Abstract: BackgroundThe results of many clinical trials and experimental studies regarding acupoint specificity are contradictory. This review aims to investigate whether a difference in efficacy exists between ordinary acupuncture on specific acupoints and sham acupuncture controls on non-acupoints or on irrelevant acupoints.MethodsDatabases including Medline, Embase, AMED and Chinese Biomedical Database were searched to identify randomized controlled trials published between 1998 and 2009 that compared traditional bod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…26 In contrast, a systematic review of the randomised controlled trials with sham acupuncture controls did not find any acupuncture point specificity. 27 Moreover, Somri et al 22 found a statistically significant antiemetic effect of standardised acupuncture at two acupuncture points without stimulation during anaesthesia. In our study, the duration of the acupuncture treatment varied according to surgery time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 In contrast, a systematic review of the randomised controlled trials with sham acupuncture controls did not find any acupuncture point specificity. 27 Moreover, Somri et al 22 found a statistically significant antiemetic effect of standardised acupuncture at two acupuncture points without stimulation during anaesthesia. In our study, the duration of the acupuncture treatment varied according to surgery time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of acupuncture in treating pain and disease has been studied from a Western scientific perspective. Systematic reviews have concluded that there is no evidence for acupuncture point specificity and suggest that needles can be inserted anywhere in appropriate segments (80,122). Here, we will use a neurophysiological approach to describe how acupuncture, specifically electro-acupuncture (EA), where needles are electrically stimulated, may work in women with PCOS, because it has good support from experimental and clinical studies (36,79).…”
Section: Acupuncturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this study also found that stimulation of verum acupuncture points and non-acupuncture points elicited similar effects, which is consistent with recent systematic reviews and studies. [13][14][15] T cells are a critical component of the adaptive immune response. Our investigation of circulating T cells showed that the number of T cells was decreased during craniotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%