Arctic petroleum: local CSR perceptions in the Nenets region of Russia

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to identify and discuss perceptions of petroleum-related corporate social responsibility (CSR) among local and regional authorities, local peoples (indigenous and non-indigenous) and representatives of petroleum companies working or living in the Nenets Autonomous Okrug (NAO) in the Russian Arctic. Although the CSR literature comprises a broad spectrum of approaches, an underrepresentation of perspectives from non-business stakeholders has been suggested. The paper seeks to redress this gap. Design/methodology/approach -The data are obtained through 34 in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted and qualitatively analysed to extrapolate perceptions, views and expectations of petroleum-related CSR in NAO. By exploring needs, wants and expectations, differences are identified between short-term expectations and long-term perspectives. Findings -A central feature of the authors' findings is the wide variation in the responses not only between community groups and sectors but also within them. The complexity identified is an argument in favour of local involvement to understand local contexts and suggests avoiding "one-size fits all" CSR approaches. Challenges and opportunities are identified for the petroleum companies in dealing with different stakeholders and diverging interests. Research limitations/implications -The importance of local context means that caution is advised when considering the transferability or generalisability of lessons, within NAO and elsewhere in and outside the Russian Arctic. Furthermore, fundamental motivations are not always transparent from interviews. Originality/value -Although a rich literature exists on CSR, this is perhaps the first study providing a cross-sectoral analysis of people's perceptions, including those of non-business stakeholders, in this region.

Which CSR Activities Are Preferred by Local Community Residents? Conjoint and Cluster Analyses

“…The research findings by Loe et al [59] provided evidence of non-homogenous community preferences. They conducted qualitative interviews and found that local needs and expectations regarding CSR contributions from companies differed among local groups and within the same community.…”

Arctic Justice

“…A fruitful initial step is to investigate existing scholarly activities in classifying responsibility. Existing literature on companies in the Arctic is firstly, environmentally focused (Hennchen, 2015;Loe et al, 2017;Overland et al, 2021), and then secondly, livelihoods focused (Wettstein, 2009;Olawuyi, 2016;McQueen, 2019). This is perhaps not surprising considering the environmentally sensitive context in which the Arctic region exists.…”

Investigating determinants of localised corporate social responsibility: evidence from Pakistan

“…In this study, we extended the previous work done by Srikrishna et al (2016) on developing communities around factories through LCSR activities. LCSR primarily focuses on the company’s activities during the year, where the company has located its manufacturing plant (Shaw, 2007; Loe et al , 2017). Artiles’s (2011) cultural-trait theory argues that directors are individuals with specific thoughts, emotions and personality characteristics that influence their behaviours.…”