Arctic hydroclimate variability during the last 2000 years: current understanding and research challenges

Abstract

Abstract. Reanalysis data show an increasing trend in Arctic precipitation over the 20th century, but changes are not homogenous across seasons or space. The observed hydroclimate changes are expected to continue and possibly accelerate in the coming century, not only affecting pan-Arctic natural ecosystems and human activities, but also lower latitudes through the atmospheric and ocean circulations. However, a lack of spatiotemporal observational data makes reliable quantification of Arctic hydroclimate change difficult, especially in a long-term context. To understand Arctic hydroclimate and its variability prior to the instrumental record, climate proxy records are needed. The purpose of this review is to summarise the current understanding of Arctic hydroclimate during the past 2000 years. First, the paper reviews the main natural archives and proxies used to infer past hydroclimate variations in this remote region and outlines the difficulty of disentangling the moisture from the temperature signal in these records. Second, a comparison of two sets of hydroclimate records covering the Common Era from two data-rich regions, North America and Fennoscandia, reveals inter- and intra-regional differences. Third, building on earlier work, this paper shows the potential for providing a high-resolution hydroclimate reconstruction for the Arctic and a comparison with last-millennium simulations from fully coupled climate models. In general, hydroclimate proxies and simulations indicate that the Medieval Climate Anomaly tends to have been wetter than the Little Ice Age (LIA), but there are large regional differences. However, the regional coverage of the proxy data is inadequate, with distinct data gaps in most of Eurasia and parts of North America, making robust assessments for the whole Arctic impossible at present. To fully assess pan-Arctic hydroclimate variability for the last 2 millennia, additional proxy records are required.

Inconsistent Response of Arctic Permafrost Peatland Carbon Accumulation to Warm Climate Phases

“…A dry MCA has been reported from a nearby region (Kremenetski et al, 2004) and some other areas for example in Arctic Canada and southern Finland (Helama et al, 2009). During the LIA, Finnish sites appear to have been wet at the beginning of the LIA, which corresponds to the humid climate recorded in Finland (Linderholm et al, 2018;Väliranta et al, 2007). Both Russian and Finnish sites suggest habitat changes towards drier communities over recent decades.…”

East European chironomid-based calibration model for past summer temperature reconstructions

“…Advances in paleoclimatology have enabled building of comprehensive outline of climate changes of the recent past, the Holocene epoch and the last Glacial cycle (McCarroll 2015, Wanner et al 2015, Linderholm et al 2018. However, the local differences and small-scale variation are still poorly established in several geographic areas.…”

Biogeochemical cycling and ecological thresholds in a High Arctic lake (Svalbard)

“…This phenomenon is most visible in the Polar Regions, where a recent pan-arctic greening of the tundra has been observed (Wookey et al 2009). In addition to increasingly productive freshwater systems in the Arctic (Michelutti et al 2005;Holmgren et al 2010), in some regions, changes in the water balance and cryogenic processes have caused disappearance of lakes (Bouchard et al 2013;Linderholm et al 2018) as well as formation of new freshwater ecosystems known as permafrost thaw ponds (Vonk et al 2015). Climate-driven biological reorganizations in the Arctic include increased primary production owing to longer summer growing seasons, increased algal habitat availability and enhanced catchment nutrient fluxes (Wrona et al 2016).…”