2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018jd029726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arctic Amplification Response to Individual Climate Drivers

Abstract: The Arctic is experiencing rapid climate change in response to changes in greenhouse gases, aerosols, and other climate drivers. Emission changes in general, as well as geographical shifts in emissions and transport pathways of short‐lived climate forcers, make it necessary to understand the influence of each climate driver on the Arctic. In the Precipitation Driver Response Model Intercomparison Project, 10 global climate models perturbed five different climate drivers separately (CO2, CH4, the solar constant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(147 reference statements)
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) resulting from a lack of a cloud lifetime effect in that model (Westervelt et al, 2017(Westervelt et al, , 2018. In all three models, the largest remote temperature responses are over the Arctic, owing to the well-established polar amplification phenomenon (Smith et al, 2019;Stjern et al, 2019). Surface temperature response is strongest in the US SO 2 and Europe SO 2 simulations in all three models, with annual mean local and remote temperature increases of up to 1 K or higher.…”
Section: Extreme Indicesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5) resulting from a lack of a cloud lifetime effect in that model (Westervelt et al, 2017(Westervelt et al, , 2018. In all three models, the largest remote temperature responses are over the Arctic, owing to the well-established polar amplification phenomenon (Smith et al, 2019;Stjern et al, 2019). Surface temperature response is strongest in the US SO 2 and Europe SO 2 simulations in all three models, with annual mean local and remote temperature increases of up to 1 K or higher.…”
Section: Extreme Indicesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Emissions of aerosols and their precursors are spatially heterogeneous and short-lived and thereby expected to exert complex responses as emissions of air pollutants are reduced through policies enacted to protect human health. Emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), black carbon (BC), and organic carbon aerosol (OA) have decreased throughout the United States and Europe for several decades (Leibensperger et al, 2012;Tørseth et al, 2012). On the other hand, emissions have largely increased in recent decades in countries such as China, India, and others in the Global South; however, since 2013, emissions of SO 2 have begun to decline at least in China, while emissions in India continue to increase (Fontes et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Lu et al, 2011;Samset et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of US anthropogenic SO 2 emissions showed robust patterns of temperature responses over land, with increases in temperature for most of the Northern Hemisphere land regions and the strongest response towards the Arctic (Conley et al, 2018;Shindell et al, 2015). Other recent model studies indicate an amplification of the temperature response towards the Arctic due to local and remote aerosol forcing Westervelt et al, 2018;Stjern et al, 2019). Furthermore, model perturbation simulations with increasing SO 2 in Europe, North America, East Asia and South Asia showed a consistent cooling almost everywhere over the Northern Hemisphere with the Arctic revealing the largest temperature response in all experiments (Lewinschal et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Arctic surface air temperature has risen at twice the rate of the global mean over the past three decades. This phenomenon is called Arctic amplification (Serreze and Barry, 2011), and our understanding of its causes is inadequate (Pithan and Mauritsen, 2014;Stjern et al, 2019). Important consequences of the rapidly increasing temperature in the Arctic are the loss of ice, resulting in the reduction of ice extent; loss of thickness; and a reduced fraction of multiyear ice (Stroeve et al, 2012) and the increasing rate of loss of the Greenland ice cap (Mouginot et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%