2008
DOI: 10.1126/science.1154800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture of a Charge-Transfer State Regulating Light Harvesting in a Plant Antenna Protein

Abstract: Energy-dependent quenching of excess absorbed light energy (qE) is a vital mechanism for regulating photosynthetic light harvesting in higher plants. All of the physiological characteristics of qE have been positively correlated with charge transfer between coupled chlorophyll and zeaxanthin molecules in the light-harvesting antenna of photosystem II (PSII). We found evidence for charge-transfer quenching in all three of the individual minor antenna complexes of PSII (CP29, CP26, and CP24), and we conclude tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

31
491
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 501 publications
(534 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
31
491
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that this is due to trimeric LHCII migration away from the photosystem II (PSII) supercomplex, which is proposed to occur within 5 min of high light exposure. 15,16 If, as suggested previously, 11,12,17 CT quenching occurs in the monomeric LHCII, this reduces the amount of excitation energy funneled to the CT quenching site. It is noteworthy that the Zea •+ TA signal slowly decreased in dark periods despite the near-constant Zea concentration, indicative of asymmetric induction-relaxation of the CT quenching mechanism.…”
Section: * S Supporting Informationmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We suggest that this is due to trimeric LHCII migration away from the photosystem II (PSII) supercomplex, which is proposed to occur within 5 min of high light exposure. 15,16 If, as suggested previously, 11,12,17 CT quenching occurs in the monomeric LHCII, this reduces the amount of excitation energy funneled to the CT quenching site. It is noteworthy that the Zea •+ TA signal slowly decreased in dark periods despite the near-constant Zea concentration, indicative of asymmetric induction-relaxation of the CT quenching mechanism.…”
Section: * S Supporting Informationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…6 However, these thylakoids had been high-light-acclimated for over 30 min before measurement, which does not indicate whether CT quenching is activated within the first few minutes of high light exposure, the time scale of qE activation. Zea •+ has also been observed in isolated minor (monomeric) light-harvesting complexes containing Zea, 11,12 but these protein conditions may not be indicative of in vivo behavior, and once again, do not give information about when CT quenching turns on during light acclimation. In a recent study, Dall'Osto and coworkers concluded that the trimeric light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) is the location of a more slowly activated (several minutes) quenching mechanism that does not involve formation of Zea •+ in vivo.…”
Section: * S Supporting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In LHCII trimers this is accomplished by conformational switching between a light-harvesting and a dissipating state (32,33), whereas in the minor antennae formation of a carotenoid radical cation was suggested to be involved (34,35). Although a photoprotective role has been suggested for Lhca complexes as well (36), little is known about the nature of this process in Lhcas, in particular whether the red Chls play an active role.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different molecular mechanisms of excitation quenching via zeaxanthin have been proposed. Among those mechanisms are the direct, singlet-singlet energy transfer from chlorophyll (Frank et al, 2000) and the formation of zeaxanthin-chlorophyll charge transfer complexes (Ahn et al, 2008). The indirect effect of zeaxanthin on excitation quenching in LHCII has also been proposed, based on the effect in molecular organization of LHCII supramolecular structures (Ruban et al, 1997;Gruszecki et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%