2015 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/mipro.2015.7160306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture and functionality in M2M standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the scalable development of M2M communication, standardization bodies felt the requirement for generic horizontal M2M architecture as a common platform for M2M application development. In Aug 2010, ETSI published the first listing of general provisions for M2M service, followed by the functional requirements for M2M communication [59], [66].…”
Section: M2m Communication Standardization Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the scalable development of M2M communication, standardization bodies felt the requirement for generic horizontal M2M architecture as a common platform for M2M application development. In Aug 2010, ETSI published the first listing of general provisions for M2M service, followed by the functional requirements for M2M communication [59], [66].…”
Section: M2m Communication Standardization Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a version of MQTT, called MQTT-SN (MQTT Sensor Network), where your PDU is encapsulated by the UDP protocol, which, in turn, is encapsulated by the IP or the 6LowPAN protocol. One of the main differences between two standards, in addition to the network layer they focus on, is the simplification of messages exchanged between broker and clients, using predefined topic identifiers and short names of topics in addition to a short message format [5].…”
Section: Mqtt: Message Queue Telemetry Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relation between M2M and IoT is viewed differently in [51] and according to this approach, M2M and IoT are concepts that overlap to some extent. Such viewpoint was also taken in the analysis of M2M and IoT relation in [52]. This analysis pointed out that the main difference between M2M and IoT is in what lies in their focus.…”
Section: A Comparison Of M2m Wsn Cps Iot and Hacmentioning
confidence: 99%