1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf03373532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architectural symbolism and non-verbal communication at upper fort garry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both in this house and in the 'chorizo', function and status of the rooms and inhabitants are expressed by means of the location and the use of objects -furniture, pictures, cutlery, mirrors, curtains and so on. This fact shows that the choice of the function for each room is dependent on its inhabitants (Monks, 1992).…”
Section: The Colonial Housementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both in this house and in the 'chorizo', function and status of the rooms and inhabitants are expressed by means of the location and the use of objects -furniture, pictures, cutlery, mirrors, curtains and so on. This fact shows that the choice of the function for each room is dependent on its inhabitants (Monks, 1992).…”
Section: The Colonial Housementioning
confidence: 96%
“…If we consider housing as a part of architecture -being itself a peculiar type of language (Fletcher, 1989;Grahame, 1995Grahame, , 1997Markus, 1993;Monks, 1992;Parker Pearson and Richards, 1994) -through the analysis of the processes affecting housing, we will be able to understand the significance it has had over time. Human landscape is built and resisted by means of a dialectical game of dominance and resistance (McGuire and Paynter, 1991;Orser and Funari, 2001).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to food has long been a manifestation of the power of certain segments of society over others, and knowing that even at its height of activity, those with "power" living at Fort Vancouver numbered only around 40, (allowing for Company officers from other posts, ship's officers, and other visitors [Roberts 1838;Jessett 1959]), an eight acre garden was significantly larger than that required to provide fresh produce for those relatively few powerful people (Loudon 1824). Based on HBC policy, only the Company officers were allowed to enjoy the Garden's food and aesthetic products (Hamilton 2000, Monks 1992. As the HBC was only a quasi-colonial entity which primarly focused on realizing profit, how was this over-sized space justified?…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HBC as a company was highly stratified socially, employing several methods of maintaining the hierarchy, including differential access to food (Hamilton 2000;Monks 1992;Nelson 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation