2004
DOI: 10.1080/01449290410001712753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architectural criteria for website evaluation – conceptual framework and empirical validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we replicate findings from earlier research (Hong and Kim, 2004;Supphellen and Nysveen, 2001) and extend their results by demonstrating that the more satisfied visitors are with the overall site …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we replicate findings from earlier research (Hong and Kim, 2004;Supphellen and Nysveen, 2001) and extend their results by demonstrating that the more satisfied visitors are with the overall site …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For example, website quality and design (Loiacono, Watson, and Goodhue, 2002;Wolfinbarger and Gilly, 2003), overall satisfaction with the website (Hong and Kim, 2004), attitude toward the website (Karson and Fisher, 2005;Supphellen and Nysveen, 2001), entertainment, and attitude toward the brand (Raney, Arpan, Pashupati, and Brill, 2003) were identified as having a positive effect on intentions to return to the website. In the same line of thought, purchase intention seems mainly affected by similar variables, including interactivity (Wu, 1999;Yoo and Stout, 2001), attitude toward the site (Jee and Lee, 2002), website quality and design (Loiacono, Watson, and Goodhue, 2002;Wolfinbarger and Gilly, 2003), and attitude toward the brand (Raney, Arpan, Pashupati, and Brill, 2003).…”
Section: Website Design and Its Effects On Satisfaction Website Loyamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on content analysis have used dichotomies to assess website content [2,7,11,32], applying the subjective judgments of researchers or evaluators [4,24,27,28,29,39,40,41]. Many researchers have evaluated websites according to whether specific content is or is not there or whether it is accurate or not.…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When designing the method of evaluation, these factors were considered. Hong & Kim (2004) proposed evaluation criteria adapted from those used for buildings, based on the similarities in objectives and dependence on user perspectives. The three views on building architecture are structural robustness, appropriate spaces, and aesthetic appeal.…”
Section: Exploratory Prototypes: Implementation and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attribute assessment was based on criteria for evaluating appropriateness of websites assembled and tested by Hong and Kim (2004). Their design principles separated user goals into utilitarian and experiential, with three principles: robustness of a website in the face of threats, the features of a website, and the appeal of interaction possibilities.…”
Section: Exploratory Prototypes: Motivation and Design Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%