The primary visual cortex (V1) receives its main thalamic drive from the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) through synaptic contacts terminating primarily in cortical layer IV. In contrast, the projections from the pulvinar nucleus to the cortex are less clearly defined. The pulvinar projects predominantly to layer I in V1, and layer IV in extrastriate areas. These projection patterns suggest that the pulvinar nucleus most strongly influences (drives) activity in cortical areas beyond V1. Should this hypothesis be true, one would expect the spatiotemporal responsesevokedbypulvinaractivationtobedifferentinV1andextrastriateareas,reflectingthedifferentconnectivitypatterns.Weinvestigated this issue by analyzing the spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical visual areas' activity following thalamic electrical microstimulation in tree shrews, using optical imaging and voltage-sensitive dyes. As expected, electrical stimulation of the dLGN induced fast and local responses in V1, as well as in extrastriate and contralateral cortical areas. In contrast, electrical stimulation of the pulvinar induced fast and local responses in extrastriate areas, followed by weak and diffuse activation in V1 and contralateral cortical areas. This study highlights spatiotemporal cortical activation characteristics induced by stimulation of first (dLGN) and high-order (pulvinar) thalamic nuclei.Key words: driver; geniculate nucleus; modulator; pulvinar; thalamocortical connections
IntroductionThe visual nuclei of the dorsal thalamus include the well studied dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN), and the more enigmatic pulvinar nucleus. In mammals, the dLGN is considered a first-order relay nucleus because it receives direct input from the retina and projects densely to the primary visual cortex (V1). In contrast, the pulvinar nucleus receives little direct input from the retina (Warner et al., 2010), projects sparsely to V1, and densely to multiple extrastriate visual cortical areas (Ogren and Hendrickson, 1977;Abramson and Chalupa, 1985;Rockland et al., 1999; Chomsung et al., 2010). Geniculocortical projections are deemed to relay visual information from the retina and "drive" cortical activity because lesions of the dLGN severely compro- Received Feb. 17, 2015; revised July 4, 2015; accepted July 20, 2015. Author contributions: M.P.V. and C.C. designed research; M.P.V. performed research; M.P.V., S.T., and C.C. analyzed data; M.P.V., S.T., H.M.P., M.E.B., and C.C. wrote the paper.This work was supported by NIH Grant EY016155 to M.E.B., H.M.P., and C.C.; FRSQ provided part of C.C.'s salary (National Researchers Program). We thank, Geneviève Cyr, Karine Minville, Martin Villeneuve, Frédéric Chavane, and David Fitzpatrick for their technical assistance, and David Fitzpatrick for providing some tree shrews.The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Significance StatementThe pulvinar nucleus represents the main extrageniculate thalamic visual structure in higher-order mammals, but its exact role remains enigmatic. The pulvin...