2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01961.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arching effect on fish body shape in geometric morphometric studies

Abstract: Upward and downward arching of the body was observed during a study on redfishes Sebastes sp. population structure in the north‐west Atlantic Ocean. The present study investigated the potential causes of this arching artefact. The results suggested that it is not related to biological factors (size or species) or to the preservation technique (freezing), but is rather due to slight posture differences between fishes during landmark capture. The consequences of the arching artefact on data analysis are discusse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, alignment of every specimen was applied through superimposition of the two landmarks at the longitudinal extremities TA B L E 1 Information on lakes where ciscoes were sampled, including form or habitat of capture (BEN = benthic net, PEL = pelagic net), presence of Mysis diluviana, and sample sizes for each type of analysis of the shape (L1 and L2; see Figure 2). Finally, an unbending procedure was executed as suggested by Valentin, Penin, Chanut, Sévigny, and Rohlf (2008) to counteract the arching effect of posture on body shape. Finally, an unbending procedure was executed as suggested by Valentin, Penin, Chanut, Sévigny, and Rohlf (2008) to counteract the arching effect of posture on body shape.…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, alignment of every specimen was applied through superimposition of the two landmarks at the longitudinal extremities TA B L E 1 Information on lakes where ciscoes were sampled, including form or habitat of capture (BEN = benthic net, PEL = pelagic net), presence of Mysis diluviana, and sample sizes for each type of analysis of the shape (L1 and L2; see Figure 2). Finally, an unbending procedure was executed as suggested by Valentin, Penin, Chanut, Sévigny, and Rohlf (2008) to counteract the arching effect of posture on body shape. Finally, an unbending procedure was executed as suggested by Valentin, Penin, Chanut, Sévigny, and Rohlf (2008) to counteract the arching effect of posture on body shape.…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce both directional and nondirectional measurement error, the full dataset comprising four landmark configurations for each specimen has been first subjected to the procedure described by Valentin et al (2008), and then the resulting coordinates of each specimen (now adjusted for body arching) were averaged to obtain a single landmark configuration for each specimen. Average centroid size measures were also computed for each specimen.…”
Section: Data Gathering and Dataset Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize the possible effect of systematic error, the fish were photographed in random order. There is also the possibility of an arching effect because of the non-rigid structure of the fish (for example, Albert et al, 2008;Valentin et al, 2008). In previous studies of threespine stickleback body shape, the effect of bending on landmark data has been eliminated by removing the eigenvectors (with their associated eigenvalues) that have described vertical arching of the body (Albert et al, 2008;Sharpe et al, 2008).…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%