Abstract:Ranging from the works of Shakespeare, Spenser, Jonson and Milton to those of Robert Southwell and Anna Trapnel, this groundbreaking study explores the conscious use of archaic style by the poets and dramatists between 1590 and 1674. It focuses on the wide-ranging, complex and self-conscious uses of archaic linguistic and poetic style, analysing the uses to which writers put literary style in order to re-embody and reshape the past. Munro brings together scholarly conversations on temporality, memory and histo… Show more
“…It is as part of this sequence that Robert Greene's Greene's Vision (1592) needs to be read. Scholars such as Cooper (2005) and Munro (2013) have been interested in the medievalism of Greene's text, especially its staged debate between the figures of Chaucer and Gower; and Maslen (2008) relates it to a wider group of "repentance" narratives attached to Greene. However, Greene's "vision" of the great Ricardian poets is part of the very peculiar mechanics of the text as a whole, and of how his text functioned within the sequence of medievalist texts of which it is an immediate part.…”
Section: Temporality and Extemporality: The Medievalist Moment Of Elizabethan Prose Fictionmentioning
The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.
“…It is as part of this sequence that Robert Greene's Greene's Vision (1592) needs to be read. Scholars such as Cooper (2005) and Munro (2013) have been interested in the medievalism of Greene's text, especially its staged debate between the figures of Chaucer and Gower; and Maslen (2008) relates it to a wider group of "repentance" narratives attached to Greene. However, Greene's "vision" of the great Ricardian poets is part of the very peculiar mechanics of the text as a whole, and of how his text functioned within the sequence of medievalist texts of which it is an immediate part.…”
Section: Temporality and Extemporality: The Medievalist Moment Of Elizabethan Prose Fictionmentioning
The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.
“…Writers frequently echo or imitate their artistic forebears, but the process of reworking outmoded styles tends to result in new hybrid forms. 23 Fredson Bowers offers a useful (if hostile) survey of how revenge tragedy was refashioned in the Caroline era, with Fletcherian mannerisms to the fore. 24 He detects no such influence on Alphonsus, though, seeing the play as very much of the Elizabethan moment, written under the sway of Kyd and Marlowe.…”
Alphonsus, Emperor of Germany is usually considered to be an Elizabethan revenge tragedy, with 1594 often suggested as a likely date of composition; some scholars have attributed the play to George Peele. Martin Wiggins has, however, recently contested the traditional date in British Drama 1533-1642: A Catalogue, giving 1630 as his own ‘best guess'. This note questions the premises behind Wiggins’s decision while putting forward new arguments in support of the traditional dating on dramaturgical grounds — arguments that perhaps lend weight to the idea that Peele had a hand in the play.
“…These imitations do not solely invoke Herbert as a model of how to combine devotional poetry with moral wisdom, however. Munro's work on conscious archaism in early‐modern literature has indicated that a text can ‘survive the moment of its original production’, and may then be deliberately re‐used as a ‘calculated continuity, or re‐evocation’ at a subsequent point in time (Munro, , p. 4). By drawing on the wisdom of Herbert's poem, penned at least twenty years prior to both the mid‐century's turmoil and the time in which Baxter, Bryan, and Wanley were writing, their use of The Temple allows their texts to look both backwards and forwards.…”
During the last two decades, studies of early‐modern networks (whether literary, social, religious, or intellectual) have often used the analytical concept of the network as a convenient metaphor. As a result, studies have not always recognized the benefits of analysing these structures through the methodologies of network analysis. The theoretical approaches and tools of network analysis have been employed in disciplines including social sciences, but only recently have scholars explored the usefulness of such quantitative methodologies within literary‐historical studies. Using a case study of the network of imitators surrounding the devotional poet, George Herbert, this essay reconsiders scholarly approaches to early‐modern literary and intellectual networks. It demonstrates how, when combined with qualitative data from textual analysis, the visual and mathematical tools of quantitative network analysis offer new ways of understanding the configurations of such groups. By moving away from using the term “network” as a metaphor, the essay shows how the perspective provided by quantitative network analysis can complement more familiar scholarly approaches of close textual analysis. Ultimately, its explication and application of these combined qualitative and quantitative research methods challenges scholars to consider how appropriating scientific methods from the field of network analysis can provide answers not only to questions about social relationships but also about questions of aesthetic practices and influence within early‐modern texts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.