2011
DOI: 10.1179/175675011x12943261434602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaeology, Community, and Identity in an English New Town

Abstract: It has been widely accepted that elements of the historic environment have been deployed to create an 'authorized heritage discourse' which supports the 'top-down' reinforcement of particular identities. Archaeology can be a vehicle for the expression of alternative identities. This article looks at the ways in which the historic environment has been used in Telford, an English new town created in the 1960s, both to support the creation of this new place, and in opposition to it. A community archaeology projec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variety of archaeological and historical pasts that are chosen by community archaeology groups and projects for exploration are selected from a number of available 'pasts', and many other histories will not be examined (Ashworth 1994). Specific heritage communities may have been selected to authorize the redevelopment of urban and rural landscapes or to reinforce fragile community identities in the light of dispersed populations (Belford 2011). Underlying the application of the term 'community archaeology' to a group or project is an assumption that 'community' can be described as a defined and homogeneous static entity, with members that share common experiences and values.…”
Section: Public Archaeology In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variety of archaeological and historical pasts that are chosen by community archaeology groups and projects for exploration are selected from a number of available 'pasts', and many other histories will not be examined (Ashworth 1994). Specific heritage communities may have been selected to authorize the redevelopment of urban and rural landscapes or to reinforce fragile community identities in the light of dispersed populations (Belford 2011). Underlying the application of the term 'community archaeology' to a group or project is an assumption that 'community' can be described as a defined and homogeneous static entity, with members that share common experiences and values.…”
Section: Public Archaeology In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing recognition that community participation in archaeological projects can have significant social and well-being benefits, encompassing physical, environmental and intellectual activities (Thomas, 2014, p. 29). This is in addition to work on identity, advocacy and memory, which is well documented (Belford, 2011;Isherwood, 2009;McDavid, 2007). These examples clearly indicate some of the public value of humanities based research and practice (Bate, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The nature of community archaeology has been long debated and a detailed review is not within the scope of this article. However, readers might consult literature including Marshall (2002), Isherwood (2009), Waterton (2010), Pyburn (2011), Belford (2011), andNeal (2015). The rate of community archaeology group formation in the UK has risen since 2000, linked to an increase in funding streams for community-led projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Still, efforts were made to attract the interest of the new town dwellers to the history and characteristics of the place (Van Opdorp ). Among at least part of the population of such new settlements, there is an interest in the roots of the seemingly completely modern environment (Belford ).…”
Section: Heritage and Planning In The New Dutch Town Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%