2012
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1201714109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaeology as a social science

Abstract: Because of advances in methods and theory, archaeology now addresses issues central to debates in the social sciences in a far more sophisticated manner than ever before. Coupled with methodological innovations, multiscalar archaeological studies around the world have produced a wealth of new data that provide a unique perspective on long-term changes in human societies, as they document variation in human behavior and institutions before the modern era. We illustrate these points with three examples: changes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Blanton and Fargher (2008) and Carballo et al (2014b) have drawn attention to the explanatory potential of collective action theory for Teotihuacan. Much exciting recent work at Teotihuacan engages the intersection of the natural and social sciences (e.g., Smith et al 2012), while interests in ideology, ritual authority, cognitive archaeology, and materiality track across the boundary of the social sciences and more humanistic and interpretive approaches (Pasztory 2005). Social forces also shape Teotihuacan archaeology and scholarship (Kelly 2011;Webmoor 2005).…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blanton and Fargher (2008) and Carballo et al (2014b) have drawn attention to the explanatory potential of collective action theory for Teotihuacan. Much exciting recent work at Teotihuacan engages the intersection of the natural and social sciences (e.g., Smith et al 2012), while interests in ideology, ritual authority, cognitive archaeology, and materiality track across the boundary of the social sciences and more humanistic and interpretive approaches (Pasztory 2005). Social forces also shape Teotihuacan archaeology and scholarship (Kelly 2011;Webmoor 2005).…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key innovation of the second phase NKI-RS is the implementation of fast repetition time (0.645 and 1.4 s TR) and high-resolution (3 and 2 mm isotropic voxels) multiband R-fMRI (10 min per scan), and DTI (137-direction, 2 mm isotropic) measures provided by the Center for Magnetic Resonance Research at the University of Minnesota for the Human Connectomes Project (Feinberg et al, 2010; Smith et al, 2012; see 4 ). Additionally, NKI-RS included a brief visual-checkerboard stimulation scan (duration = 2 min) for each of the multiband sequences to allow for assessment of the contrast to noise ratio.…”
Section: The Enhanced Nki-rs: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the age range for the design spans human development from childhood to late adulthood (6–85 years old). Second, the project is applying state-of-the-art resting-state structural and functional MRI (R-fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) techniques (Feinberg et al, 2010; Moeller et al, 2010; Feinberg and Yacoub, 2012; Smith et al, 2012), which minimize the obsolescence of these data along with participant burden. Third, imaging and genetic data are accompanied by a comprehensive phenotypic characterization (e.g., psychiatric, neurocognitive, psychological, and behavioral), to facilitate identification of developmental patterns (Evans and Brain Development Cooperative Group, 2006; Shaw et al, 2006a,b; Giedd and Rapoport, 2010; Giedd et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La alternativa metodológica que defendemos como base para la aplicación de un programa sistemático de análisis tipo Household Archaeology en la península Ibérica, parte de una concepción de la Arqueología clásica y protohistórica como una ciencia social de comparación histórica (Smith et al 2012). Teniendo esto en cuenta, creemos que el análisis arqueológico de los espacios domésticos de las sociedades antiguas, tal como la hemos delineado, se enfrenta a dos retos fundamentales para el futuro.…”
Section: Reflexiones Finales: Posibilidades Y Direcciones Futurasunclassified