2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48657-4_384-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaeology and Sea-Level Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary concern is describing the function of the archaeological sea‐level indicator to determine an original elevation (Evelpidou & Pirazzoli, 2015; Morhange & Marriner, 2015). Although harbor structures provide more reliable sea‐level data (Evelpidou & Karkani, 2018; Morhange & Marriner, 2015; Vacchi et al, 2016), building installations could be a reasonable indicator in some locations. For instance, the Lycians, who were a maritime society, preferred to establish settlements in sheltered regions, directly using the coastline where the geographical conditions were quite suitable for such occupation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The primary concern is describing the function of the archaeological sea‐level indicator to determine an original elevation (Evelpidou & Pirazzoli, 2015; Morhange & Marriner, 2015). Although harbor structures provide more reliable sea‐level data (Evelpidou & Karkani, 2018; Morhange & Marriner, 2015; Vacchi et al, 2016), building installations could be a reasonable indicator in some locations. For instance, the Lycians, who were a maritime society, preferred to establish settlements in sheltered regions, directly using the coastline where the geographical conditions were quite suitable for such occupation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, it was important to determine the relationship with the former sea level to reconstruct sea‐level changes and define archaeological zonation considering three categories: submerged zone, interface structures zone, and emerged structures zone, which affect the degree of reliability of the archaeological indicators (Morhange & Marriner, 2015). Interface structures of harbors (e.g., quays and docks) and fish tanks are accepted as reliable indicators when compared to emerged structures that are not directly related to the former sea level (e.g., buildings and roads; Evelpidou & Karkani, 2018; Morhange & Marriner, 2015; Vacchi et al, 2016). For the estimation of relative sea‐level change, we took into account quay structures among the submerged remains at the Şövalye and Ölüdeniz sites, since their function is directly related to sea level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of RSL reconstruction carried out using archeological sea level markers depends on determining the association with the former sea levels (Morhange & Marriner, 2015). The interface structures of the harbors (e.g., quays and breakwaters) provided reliable data on the amount of sea level change (Evelpidou & Karkani, 2018; Morhange & Marriner, 2015; Vacchi et al, 2016). In general, the presence of fixed biological zonation on archeological structures significantly improves the reliability of sea level index points (SLIP; indicators of former RSLs) (Morhange & Marriner, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%