2011
DOI: 10.14237/ebl.1.2010.58-65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaeological Protein Residues: New Data for Conservation Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach had mainly been applied to artifact residues from tightly controlled cooking experiments (Barker et al 2012;Stevens et al 2010) or as identification of bone proteins from individual specimens (Barker 2011;Wolverton et al 2014). Our results indicate that our approach, which includes optimized extraction and solvent parameters from previous research (Barker et al 2012), leads to reliable identification of proteins when they are extracted from ancient bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach had mainly been applied to artifact residues from tightly controlled cooking experiments (Barker et al 2012;Stevens et al 2010) or as identification of bone proteins from individual specimens (Barker 2011;Wolverton et al 2014). Our results indicate that our approach, which includes optimized extraction and solvent parameters from previous research (Barker et al 2012), leads to reliable identification of proteins when they are extracted from ancient bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Their utility for bone protein extraction was preliminarily validated through previous attempts using individual samples of archaeological bone (see Barker 2011;Wolverton et al 2014), but were here applied for the first time to a relatively large and diverse collection of specimens. Briefly, we pulverized a portion of each bone sample in a sterile mortar and pestle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%