Archaeological Digital Archiving in Heritage Management in Slovakia

Abstract

The Monuments Board of the Slovak Republic (MB SR) and the Regional Monuments Boards have been the state administrators of the cultural heritage, including archaeology, since 2002. This article aims to map the current state of archaeological digital archives within MB SR and eight Regional Monuments Boards, as well as present the usage and management of digital datasets within ongoing projects. The central archive of the MB SR maintains historical plans and cultural heritage documentation, created since the 1920s and continuously digitised (the collections of negatives, diapositives, projects, plans, schematic maps, and fieldwork documentation). Since 2012, MB SR has taken part in the Digital Monuments Fund project. Within this project, 2D and 3D documentation of a great number of cultural monuments has been created. In 2019 the implementation phase of the Monuments information system (PAMIS) project started. Its basic modules are the presentation layer, the knowledge agenda and state administration. There are several features in preparation within these modules, such as: updating; collection, consolidation and GIS processing of archaeological site data that belong to the monuments fund, including data from aerial laser scanning; the archaeological excavation registry and the archive of fieldwork reports; the registry of finds in the administration of MB SR; the electronic processing of the state administration activity within the protection of the archaeological cultural heritage. The PAMIS project will provide processed data and make them accessible to the state and public administration, owners of monuments, as well as to professionals and the general public, using online solutions (web GIS) with various approaches according to defined user roles.

Neolithic Settlements in Central Europe: Data from the Project ‘Lifestyle as an Unintentional Identity in the Neolithic’

“…Nonetheless, there are biases present in the dataset resulting from different intensities and practices of archaeological research conducted in different regions and/or states included in the study area caused by various factors, e.g., research interests, distance to large cities, budgets, data management and archiving etc. See Issue 58 of Internet Archaeology for details on how archaeological data is managed in Austria [5], the Czech Republic [6] and Slovakia [7].…”

Adopt, Adapt, and Share! FAIR Archeological Data for Studying Roman Rural Landscapes in Northern Noricum

“…Smaller repositories, in particular, face difficulties with interoperability and sustainability. As a result, standardizing practices and fostering collaborations are crucial for integrating these repositories into the global research community (Bibby, 2021;Bisták et al, 2021;Calandra et al, 2021;Correia & Silva, 2023;Faniel et al, 2018;Geser et al, 2022;Göldner et al, 2023;Huvila, 2020;Jantos & Sommer, 2021;Juty et al, 2020;Kansa et al, 2020;Kreiter, 2021;Nicholson et al, 2023;Novák et al, 2021;Oniszczuk & Makowska, 2021;Richards, 2021Richards, , 2023bRichards, , 2023aRichards et al, 2021;Seaton et al, 2023;Štular, 2021;Trognitz, 2021;Wallis et al, 2013;Wilkinson et al, 2016).…”