2017
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaeogenomic analysis of the first steps of Neolithization in Anatolia and the Aegean

Abstract: The Neolithic transition in west Eurasia occurred in two main steps: the gradual development of sedentism and plant cultivation in the Near East and the subsequent spread of Neolithic cultures into the Aegean and across Europe after 7000 cal BCE. Here, we use published ancient genomes to investigate gene flow events in west Eurasia during the Neolithic transition. We confirm that the Early Neolithic central Anatolians in the ninth millennium BCE were probably descendants of local hunter-gatherers, rather than … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neolithic whole genomes from present-day Greece and western Anatolia are almost indistinguishable, supporting a common Aegean Neolithic population spreading across the Aegean Sea (Hofmanová et al, 2016). Caucasus HG-related ancestry is present in some of the late Neolithic Aegean individuals, Chalcolithic Anatolians (Kılınç et al, 2017;Lazaridis et al, 2017;Omrak et al, 2016), LBA Mycenaeans, and Early to Middle BA (EMBA) Minoans (Lazaridis et al, 2017), raising the possibility of gene flow from the East. LBA Mycenaeans also show evidence for an ancestry attributable to gene flow from the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, or from Armenia (Lazaridis et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neolithic whole genomes from present-day Greece and western Anatolia are almost indistinguishable, supporting a common Aegean Neolithic population spreading across the Aegean Sea (Hofmanová et al, 2016). Caucasus HG-related ancestry is present in some of the late Neolithic Aegean individuals, Chalcolithic Anatolians (Kılınç et al, 2017;Lazaridis et al, 2017;Omrak et al, 2016), LBA Mycenaeans, and Early to Middle BA (EMBA) Minoans (Lazaridis et al, 2017), raising the possibility of gene flow from the East. LBA Mycenaeans also show evidence for an ancestry attributable to gene flow from the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, or from Armenia (Lazaridis et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent ancient DNA studies have contributed to four major discoveries about the Holocene human population history in Eurasia: i. Gene flow from Near East through Europe during the Neolithization 1 7 , ii. Genetic continuity between pre-Neolithic and Neolithic populations of Near East 8 10 , iii. Increased mobility in West Eurasia during Bronze Age 11 , 12 , and iv.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have to travel further afield to find more information for this period. In central Anatolia, Çatalhöyük is clearly the most important site, and its chipped-stone industry is well documented (Conolly 1999;Carter, Milić 2013;Kayacan 2015). Closer to the obsidian outcrops of Cappadocia, we also have data from Tepecik (Bıçakçı et al 2012).…”
Section: Central Anatoliamentioning
confidence: 91%