2014
DOI: 10.1080/00206814.2014.958578
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Archaean Kuru-Vaara eclogites in the northern Belomorian Province, Fennoscandian Shield: crustal architecture, timing, and tectonic implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Belomorian Province, together with the Karelian, Kola, Murmansk and Norrbotten Provinces, constitutes the ancient nucleus of the Fennoscandian (Baltic) Shield (Figure a). On the west, it is bounded by the Palaeoproterozoic (1.9–1.8 Ga) Svecofennian accretionary orogen, and on the northeast, it is cross‐cut by the 2.0–1.9 Ga Lapland–Kola collisional orogen (Balagansky et al., ; Hölttä et al., ; Slabunov, Lobach‐Zhuchenko, Bibikova, Balangansky, et al., ; Slabunov, Lobach‐Zhuchenko, Bibikova, Sorjonen‐Ward, et al., ). The Belomorian Province is thrust on the Archean Karelian Province (Craton) along a system of Palaeoproterozoic faults, and it consists of a few Archean tectonic nappes (Daly, Balagansky, Timmerman, & Whitehouse, ; Glebovitsky, ; Miller & Mil'kevich, ; Mints, Suleimanov, Zamozhniaya, & Stupak, ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Belomorian Province, together with the Karelian, Kola, Murmansk and Norrbotten Provinces, constitutes the ancient nucleus of the Fennoscandian (Baltic) Shield (Figure a). On the west, it is bounded by the Palaeoproterozoic (1.9–1.8 Ga) Svecofennian accretionary orogen, and on the northeast, it is cross‐cut by the 2.0–1.9 Ga Lapland–Kola collisional orogen (Balagansky et al., ; Hölttä et al., ; Slabunov, Lobach‐Zhuchenko, Bibikova, Balangansky, et al., ; Slabunov, Lobach‐Zhuchenko, Bibikova, Sorjonen‐Ward, et al., ). The Belomorian Province is thrust on the Archean Karelian Province (Craton) along a system of Palaeoproterozoic faults, and it consists of a few Archean tectonic nappes (Daly, Balagansky, Timmerman, & Whitehouse, ; Glebovitsky, ; Miller & Mil'kevich, ; Mints, Suleimanov, Zamozhniaya, & Stupak, ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, ancient (>2.0–1.9 Ga) high‐grade metamorphic terranes rarely preserve (pristine) eclogite—examples are the Hengshan granulite complex (North China Craton, 1.9–1.8 Ga, Zhao, Cawood, Wilde, & Lu, ), the Snowbird granulite–eclogite complex (Canada, 1.9 Ga, Baldwin, Bowring, & Williams, ), the Lapland granulite complex (Russia, 1.9 Ga, Daly et al., ) and the Ubendian/Usagaran eclogite‐bearing complex (Tanzania, 2.0–1.9 Ga, Collins, Reddy, Buchan, & Mruma, ). Overall, there are three scenarios invoked for the formation and evolution of the Belomorian eclogites (see Perchuk & Morgunova, ): scenario I, a single Mesoarchean eclogite facies metamorphism (Dokukina & Konilov, ; Dokukina et al., ; Mints, Belousova, et al., ; Mints, Konilov, et al., ); scenario II, at least two eclogite facies events in the Archean and the Palaeoproterozoic (Balagansky et al., ; Slabunov, Stepanova, Bibikova, Babarina, & Matukov, ; Slabunov, Volodichev, Skublov, & Berezin, ; Volodichev, Slabunov, Sibelev, Skublov, & Kuzenko, ); and, scenario III, a single Palaeoproterozoic eclogite facies metamorphism at 1.9 Ga (Herwartz, Skublov, Berezin, & Mel'nik, ; Mel'nik, Skublov, Marin, Berezin, & Bogomolov, ; Skublov, Berezin, & Mel'nik, ; Skublov et al., ; Travin & Kozlova, ). The Shirokaya Salma eclogites have previously been considered as having a Meso‐Neoarchean age (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since an Archean age (2.87–2.72 Ga) was ascribed to eclogites of the Belomorian Province (Mints et al., ; Volodichev, Slabunov, Bibikova, Konilov, & Kuzenko, ), the so‐called “oldest eclogite” has attracted much attention. Recently, two major eclogite types have been recognized in the Belomorian Province in the southwestern foreland of the Paleoproterozoic Lapland–Kola collisional orogeny (Figure a,b), the Salma and Gridino types (Balagansky et al, ; Dokukina et al., ; Li, Zhang, Wei & Slabunov, ; Liu et al., ; Mints, Dokukina, & Konilov, ; Mints et al., ; Perchuk & Morgunova, ). Compared with the Salma‐type eclogites, those in the Gridino area are more abundant and less retrogressed (Mints et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified after H€ oltt€ as et al (2008). (c) Geological map of the Stolbikha Island and sample locations (modified after Li, Zhang, Wei, & Slabunov 2015) foreland of the Paleoproterozoic Lapland-Kola collisional orogeny (Figure 1a,b), the Salma and Gridino types (Balagansky et al, 2014;Dokukina et al, 2014;Li, Zhang, Wei & Slabunov, 2015;Liu et al, 2017;Mints et al, 2010;Perchuk & Morgunova, 2014). Compared with the Salma-type eclogites, those in the Gridino area are more abundant and less retrogressed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vein-like or lenticular garnet-phengite-quartz bodies in blocks of subduction-related eclogites were studied in the Kuru-Vaara quarry (Figs 2 & 3). The occurrence of these veins had been noted by Dokukina et al (2012bDokukina et al ( , 2014a, Shchipansky et al (2012b) and Balagansky et al (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%