DOI: 10.29007/68dk
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ARCH-COMP 2019 Category Report: Falsification

Abstract: This report presents the results from the 2019 friendly competition in the ARCH workshop for the falsification of temporal logic specifications over Cyber-Physical Systems. We describe the organization of the competition and how it differs from previous years. We give background on the participating teams and tools and discuss the selected benchmarks and results. The benchmarks are available on the ARCH website1, as well as in the competition’s gitlab repository2. The main outcome of the 2019 competition is a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also show the result of a pure random sampling process (PureRandom) to confirm the hardness of the benchmarks. We also note that φ 1 and φ 7 contain AT1 and a variant of AT5 specifications in [20]. Both of the specifications are falsified by GA 10 times out of 10 trials.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also show the result of a pure random sampling process (PureRandom) to confirm the hardness of the benchmarks. We also note that φ 1 and φ 7 contain AT1 and a variant of AT5 specifications in [20]. Both of the specifications are falsified by GA 10 times out of 10 trials.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…It is also a future work to conduct further detailed experimental evaluation to compare with more tools by using the ARCH-COMP benchmark [20], or to optimize some parameters. For example, for the alphabet size, there should exist a trade-off between the computation cost and covering a larger class of signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specifications concern the relation between the three output signals to check whether the car is subject to some unexpected or unsafe behaviors. The second benchmark is the Abstract Fuel Control (AFC) model [16,25]. It takes two input signals, pedal angle∈ [8.8, 90] and engine speed∈[900, 1100], and outputs the critical signal airfuel ratio (AF ), which influences fuel efficiency and car performance.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specifications check whether this property holds under both normal mode and power enrichment mode. The third benchmark is a model of a magnetic levitation system with a NARMA-L2 neurocontroller (NN) [7,16]. It takes one input signal, Ref ∈ [1,3], which is the reference for the output signal Pos, the position of a magnet suspended above an electromagnet.…”
Section: (B) Sbenchmentioning
confidence: 99%