1966
DOI: 10.1088/0508-3443/17/12/306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arc initiation at metal surfaces in a hydrogen Penning discharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the high power levels and long pulse length used in these experiments the electrode surfaces probably reached much higher temperatures than those attained by other workers (Maxfield andFredenhall 1938, Holliday andIsaacs 1966). This view is consistent with two other observations : incandescent spots seen on graphite and tungsten when bombarded at a voltage level where few arcs occurred and a marked tendency for arcs on fully conditioned specimens to occur at the end of the rf pulses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the high power levels and long pulse length used in these experiments the electrode surfaces probably reached much higher temperatures than those attained by other workers (Maxfield andFredenhall 1938, Holliday andIsaacs 1966). This view is consistent with two other observations : incandescent spots seen on graphite and tungsten when bombarded at a voltage level where few arcs occurred and a marked tendency for arcs on fully conditioned specimens to occur at the end of the rf pulses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Maxfield and Fredenhall (1938) examined the arcing behaviour of a graphite electrode in a mercury discharge at ion current densities in the region of 10 A m-2. For thermonuclear work, Craston et al (1958), Maskrey and Dugdale (1966) and Holliday and Isaacs (1966) worked with various forms of hydrogen discharge at current densities up to 200 kA m-2. We have approached the problem by studying the resistance to arcing of a range of likely anode materials (refractory metals and graphite) for high-voltage mercury arc valves, under conditions simulating commutation using ion current densities of up to 2.0 kA m-2, The work is also applicable to plasma electron beam sources (Dugdale 1968) and hollow cathode electron beam sources (Lidsky 1964) which operate at comparable current densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems unlikely that this mechanism could apply to small surface impurities either in particulate or layer form since any electrons formed at the dielectric-metal junction could not attain sufficient energy to produce positive charging by secondary electron emission with the fields under consideration. In studies of the glow to arc transition (Holliday andIsaacs 1966, Maskrey andDugdale 1966) breakdown across the plasma-cathode sheath was attributed to positive ion charging and heating of the impurity inclusions. It is clear that if a mechanism for charging of impurities exists then breakdown may be initiated by a trigger discharge across the surface of or through the impurity itself.…”
Section: Model For Electroluminescence Breakdown Initiation and Elect...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting values of E varied in a random fashion by only 25% from a median 2.1 MV cm-l as YO was increased from 7 to 13 kv, despite a wide range of plasma parameters. While this field was insufficient for adequate field emission from a smooth surface, it was probably able to initiate cathode spots at surface defects or inclusions (Holliday and Isaacs 1966). Support for the field-emission spot mechanism was obtained from the voltage-current characteristics.…”
Section: Vomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…More recently several mechanisms have been proposed to explain arc initiation and the cathode 'conditioning' effect. These include field emission at surface irregularities, impurity centres or deposits (Holliday and Isaacs 1966), the electrical !breakdown and vaporization of insulating surface inclusions, perhaps involving the evaporation of surface contaminants (Maskrey and Dugdale 1966), and the vaporization of particles in poor thermal contact with the surface (Holliday and Isaacs 1966).…”
Section: Vomentioning
confidence: 99%