2014 American Control Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2014.6858688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arbitrary pole placement with the extended Kautsky-Nichols-van Dooren parametric form with minimum gain

Abstract: Abstract-We consider the classic problem of pole placement by state feedback. We revisit the well-known eigenstructure assignment algorithm of Kautsky, Nichols and van Dooren [1] and extend it to obtain a novel parametric form for the pole-placing feedback matrix that can deliver any set of desired closed-loop eigenvalues, with any desired multiplicities. This parametric formula is then employed to introduce an unconstrained nonlinear optimisation algorithm to obtain a feedback matrix that delivers the desired… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a given real m × n parameter matrix K, we obtain the eigenvector matrix X(K) and gain matrix F(K) by building the Jordan chains of closedloop generalised eigenvectors; the chains commence with the selection of eigenvectors from the kernel of certain matrix pencils. Thus the results of [1] neatly parallel the achievements of [11]- [12] in providing another novel parametric form to achieve pole placement with arbitrary multiplicities, while employing an m × n-dimensional parameter matrix. The virtue of having a comprehensive parametric formula for the matrices X and F that solve (2) is that they invite the consideration of optimal pole placement problems, in which one seeks a gain matrix that will deliver the desired closed-loop eigenstructure and also provide some other desirable features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For a given real m × n parameter matrix K, we obtain the eigenvector matrix X(K) and gain matrix F(K) by building the Jordan chains of closedloop generalised eigenvectors; the chains commence with the selection of eigenvectors from the kernel of certain matrix pencils. Thus the results of [1] neatly parallel the achievements of [11]- [12] in providing another novel parametric form to achieve pole placement with arbitrary multiplicities, while employing an m × n-dimensional parameter matrix. The virtue of having a comprehensive parametric formula for the matrices X and F that solve (2) is that they invite the consideration of optimal pole placement problems, in which one seeks a gain matrix that will deliver the desired closed-loop eigenstructure and also provide some other desirable features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Byers and Nash used Corollary 2.1 to obtain a parametric form for the matrix of eigenvectors X satisfying (2), and then employed it to consider the REPP problem for the case of a diagonal Λ matrix. In [1] we adapted Corollary 2.1 to obtain a parametric form for X and F that can accommodate any admissible Jordan structure (L , M , P) for (A, B), and we now briefly summarise this method. We begin by noting that for each i ∈ {1, .…”
Section: Pole Placement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations