2023
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2023.3267240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arbitrary-Oriented Ellipse Detector for Ship Detection in Remote Sensing Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method fundamentally addressed the boundary issue of angle regression. Zhou et al [100] proposed an ellipse method, represented by (x, y, |u|, |v|, m, α), as shown in Figure 15b, where α = 0 represents that the ship belongs to the second and fourth quadrants; α = 1 represents that the ship belongs to the first and third quadrants. Furthermore, m is the difference between the length of the major axis and the focal vector.…”
Section: Obb Representation and Regression-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method fundamentally addressed the boundary issue of angle regression. Zhou et al [100] proposed an ellipse method, represented by (x, y, |u|, |v|, m, α), as shown in Figure 15b, where α = 0 represents that the ship belongs to the second and fourth quadrants; α = 1 represents that the ship belongs to the first and third quadrants. Furthermore, m is the difference between the length of the major axis and the focal vector.…”
Section: Obb Representation and Regression-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further validate the effectiveness of the proposed method for ship detection, this section compares the proposed SAD-Det with several arbitrarily oriented ship detection methods on RSDD-SAR from both inshore and offshore perspectives. These methods include KeyShip [69], SaDet [27], AEDet [70], and MT-FANet [71]. Since the aforementioned methods are not open source, we reproduce the structure of SaDet and conduct experiments, citing the best experimental results from the other studies as our comparison values.…”
Section: E Comparison With Arbitrarily Oriented Ship Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo et al [28] introduced a new encoding representation to describe the OBB and incorporated a feature adaptive module to refine each feature pyramid layer. Zhou et al [29] presented a simple ellipse parameters representation method for objects in any direction, utilizing the YOLOX [30] algorithm for directional ship detection and yielding favourable results. Zhou et al [31] designed a new anchorfree keypoint-based detection method called KeyShip for highprecision detection of oriented ships in SAR images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method for determining the long half-axis is reported to be too complicated, and the constraints applied to the parameters appear to be incomplete. For a detailed understanding of the constraints, further information is available in the paper [11]. Additionally, RIE introduces the concept of eccentricitywise orientation loss to achieve more-accurate orientation estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to ProjBB and RIE, Jiang et al's method employs a larger number of parameters to describe the oriented bounding box. In the context of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) ship detection, Zhou et al proposed a new vector-decompositionbased arbitrarily oriented object-detection method called AEDet [11]. AEDet employs six parameters (x, y, |u|, |v|, m, α) to describe the oriented bounding box.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%