Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (IEEE Cat. No.03EX795)
DOI: 10.1109/isspit.2003.1341178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arabic speech recognition using recurrent neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next system [7] , which is a medium sized vocabulary system gave results that ranged from %8 and %4.2 WER. Small vocabulary isolated ASR systems like [9] obtained word error rate that ranged between %15 and %0, while [8] had a % 2.14 WER. Systems that concentrated on the Egyptian colloquial Arabic were all large vocabulary systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The next system [7] , which is a medium sized vocabulary system gave results that ranged from %8 and %4.2 WER. Small vocabulary isolated ASR systems like [9] obtained word error rate that ranged between %15 and %0, while [8] had a % 2.14 WER. Systems that concentrated on the Egyptian colloquial Arabic were all large vocabulary systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third work, an isolated speech recognition system based on Neural Network was done at the American University of Beirut [8] . Finally, another Neural Network system that also accepts isolated speech was developed by [9] . The second group focused on the recognition of Egyptian Colloquial Arabic (ECA).…”
Section: Variability Caused By Dialectical Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elman neural network is a special kind of a recurrent srly-network originally developed for speech recognition es), [1,4,10]. It is a two-layer network in which the hidden r of layer is recurrent.…”
Section: Elman Nn ) Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River water quality classifications have been conducted in [15] using SOM, Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis and the results show that SOM is better than the other two methods. RNN has been used in [16] for Arabic speech recognition while in [17] RNN has been used to detect the real extent of snow in mountainous regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%