2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45563-0_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arabic Domain Terminology Extraction: A Literature Review

Abstract: Abstract. Domain terminology extraction is an important step in many applications such as ontology building and information retrieval. Analyzing a corpus to automatically extract key terms is a difficult task, especially in the case of Arabic language. The complexity of spelling, morphology and semantics of Arabic makes natural language processing tasks quite difficult. In addition to the complexity of Arabic, the challenges related to domain terminology extraction are caused by the inherent difficulty in dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a second part of our work consists on applying some combining methods to better quantify these semantic relationships. However, to better model semantics, we plan as further work study other existing semantic approaches like ontology construction (Belkredim & AlSebai, 2009;Bounhas et al, 2014;Bounhas et al, 2011;Khan & Luo, 2002). The chosen combination approaches were based on empirical tests but future works can determine weights in an interactive way like in Neji et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a second part of our work consists on applying some combining methods to better quantify these semantic relationships. However, to better model semantics, we plan as further work study other existing semantic approaches like ontology construction (Belkredim & AlSebai, 2009;Bounhas et al, 2014;Bounhas et al, 2011;Khan & Luo, 2002). The chosen combination approaches were based on empirical tests but future works can determine weights in an interactive way like in Neji et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%