1984
DOI: 10.1051/jphys:01984004502022500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ar*(3p5 4s, 3P0,2) on Ar(3p6, 1S0) collisions at thermal energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The error results primarily from uncertainty in the background pressure (∼8 × 10 −9 mbar). This total cross section is a combination of elastic metastability exchange [27,28] and direct processes and corresponds well to a value of 5.6 × 10 −14 cm 2 determined at higher energy and with theoretical values [29,30].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The error results primarily from uncertainty in the background pressure (∼8 × 10 −9 mbar). This total cross section is a combination of elastic metastability exchange [27,28] and direct processes and corresponds well to a value of 5.6 × 10 −14 cm 2 determined at higher energy and with theoretical values [29,30].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Nevertheless, due to the gerade-ungerade symmetry of the molecular states of, for instance, the Ar 2 * system, the resonant metastability-exchange process between metastable and ground-state atoms, such as Ar * ( 3 P 0,2 ) + Ar → Ar + Ar * ( 3 P 0,2 ), is an efficient way to produce a metastable atom beam, the quality of which is almost as good as that of the genuine 'natural' nozzle beam. This characteristic of the exchange process has been demonstrated by crossing at 90 • an effusive beam of metastable Ar * atoms with a Campargue nozzle beam of ground-state Ar atom [12]. This has been also observed and analysed in [13], in a collinear configuration of the groundstate and metastable atom beams and in the low energy range (down to 16.5 meV), by means of a time-of-flight analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…one half of the difference between gerade and ungerade amplitudes. Evidently, this signal is maximum at an angle of 90° in the laboratory, corresponding to the maximum polar angle  = , in the center of mass referential frame where the exchange amplitude has to be evaluated [22]. On another hand, at 5 meV, the exchange differential cross section is well under the indiscernibility differential cross section (see figure 3).…”
Section: I-2 Wave Function Scattering Amplitudes and Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…one half of the difference between gerade and ungerade amplitudes. Evidently, this signal is maximum at an angle of 90°in the laboratory, corresponding to the maximum polar angle θ=π, in the CM referential frame where the exchange amplitude has to be evaluated [23].…”
Section: Wave Function Scattering Amplitudes and Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 95%