2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-022-01408-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquifer vulnerability identification using DRASTIC-LU model modification by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 is a crucial risk indicator, followed by market risk factors. Building a new type of power system is important to correctly understand the contradictions between the market and the market [11]. The third is the technical risk factor, which refers to the uncertainty of various technologies used in the operation of the new power system.…”
Section: New Power System Operational Effectiveness Evaluation Index ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 is a crucial risk indicator, followed by market risk factors. Building a new type of power system is important to correctly understand the contradictions between the market and the market [11]. The third is the technical risk factor, which refers to the uncertainty of various technologies used in the operation of the new power system.…”
Section: New Power System Operational Effectiveness Evaluation Index ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure involves first calculating the ROC curve by adjusting the classification threshold for potential zones and subsequently computing the AUC to distinguish between zones of high and low potential. To compare the True-Positive Rate (TPR) and False-Positive Rate (FPR), an R-squared analysis can be employed to gauge the degree of alignment between the weights allocated through the AHP and the actual GIS values of the groundwater potential for groundwater delineation [47]. Validation is a technique used in the AHP method to evaluate the performance of the model by dividing the data into training and validation sets, using the training data to train the model and the validation data to evaluate its performance.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifications for the resulting vulnerability indexes are established based on their values, e.g., divided into five classes which have equal intervals [11,27,28]. Hamza et al [9] propose a categorisation by dividing the vulnerability index values into five equal classes using the percentage range: "very low" (10.00-28.99), "low" (29.00-46.99), "medium" (47.00-64.99), "high" (65.00-82.99) and "very high" (83.00-100).…”
Section: Hydraulic Conductivity (C) Drasticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrate concentration serves as a vital indicator of groundwater pollution, as elevated nitrate levels are associated with contamination resulting from anthropogenic and agricultural activities [34]. Therefore, nitrate concentration is a reliable and commonly used parameter for validating groundwater vulnerability assessment results [7,27,28]. In Estonia, monitoring nitrate concentration is a crucial aspect of national groundwater quality assessment.…”
Section: Validation By Using Nitrate Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%