2011
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquifer parameter estimation using an incremental area method

Abstract: Abstract:Theoretical well functions have been derived over the years to predict ground water level behaviour in aquifer systems under stress owing to groundwater extraction. The drawdown data collected during pump tests are typically analysed using graphical curve-matching procedures to estimate aquifer parameters based on these well functions. Difficulty in aquifer characteristic identification and parameter estimation may arise when the field data do not perfectly match the drawdown curves obtained from the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TCFM relies on a set of type curves obtained from the well function, with the most important procedure being curve superposition to determine best fit. Although TCFM is one of the most popular methods for pumping test analysis and is even regarded as a standard for verifying the applicability and accuracy of other methods (Li, ), difficulty in aquifer characteristic identification and parameter estimation may arise when field data do not perfectly match the drawdown curves obtained from the well function (Avci et al ., ). TCFM also involves subjective judgment, which greatly influences the results.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TCFM relies on a set of type curves obtained from the well function, with the most important procedure being curve superposition to determine best fit. Although TCFM is one of the most popular methods for pumping test analysis and is even regarded as a standard for verifying the applicability and accuracy of other methods (Li, ), difficulty in aquifer characteristic identification and parameter estimation may arise when field data do not perfectly match the drawdown curves obtained from the well function (Avci et al ., ). TCFM also involves subjective judgment, which greatly influences the results.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The latter is preferable when estimating parameters as its associated calculation is more accurate than that of the former. It is widely believed that the transient flow theory first developed by Theis () forms the foundation of the majority of present‐day groundwater hydraulics theories, with many hydraulic tests and theoretical studies carried out on this basis (Rushton and Holt, ; Aziz and Wong, ; Samani et al ., ; Wen et al ., ; Avci et al ., , ). However, Theis did not consider leakage from adjacent aquifers or aquitards, making his theory inapplicable to leaky aquifer systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and Avci et al . () have shown how information on the radial variability of the transmissivity field can be extracted from a single‐well pumping test data. Avci et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avci et al . () have developed an integration technique for discrete portion of the drawdown data to assess changes in the hydraulic properties as the cone of depression expands during the pumping test. These methods, however, provide an averaging of the transmissivity field over the entire cone of depression assuming that all of the parts of the transmissivity field within the cone of depression equally influence the drawdown behaviour at the monitoring points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation