2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aqueous Processed Biopolymer Interfaces for Single-Cell Microarrays

Abstract: Single-cell microarrays are emerging tools to unravel intrinsic diversity within complex cell populations, opening up new approaches for the in-depth understanding of highly relevant diseases. However, most of the current methods for their fabrication are based on cumbersome patterning approaches, employing organic solvents and/or expensive materials. Here, we demonstrate an unprecedented green-chemistry strategy to produce single-cell capture biochips onto glass surfaces by all-aqueous inkjet printing. At fir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the needle size employed in this study was the smallest available size by the manufacturer, future studies can divert towards non-contact droplets printing methods such as piezoelectric inkjet printing or drop-impact printing systems, which could significantly reduce the minimum limit of micropattern size [ 59 , 60 ]. Several advanced bioprinting systems have recently demonstrated the possibility of producing cell micropatterns within 30 ​μm using drop-on-demand inkjet printing [ 61 , 62 ]. Notably, we also attempted to directly print cells by incorporating the PC-12 ​cells into the aGO-COL composite at a concentration of 1 ​× ​10 7 ​cells/mL as a bioink ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the needle size employed in this study was the smallest available size by the manufacturer, future studies can divert towards non-contact droplets printing methods such as piezoelectric inkjet printing or drop-impact printing systems, which could significantly reduce the minimum limit of micropattern size [ 59 , 60 ]. Several advanced bioprinting systems have recently demonstrated the possibility of producing cell micropatterns within 30 ​μm using drop-on-demand inkjet printing [ 61 , 62 ]. Notably, we also attempted to directly print cells by incorporating the PC-12 ​cells into the aGO-COL composite at a concentration of 1 ​× ​10 7 ​cells/mL as a bioink ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of direct dispensing of cells into a specific position, a surface is modified digitally to provide sites for cell attachment. This method removes the need to expose cells to the potentially damaging effects of inkjet printing [50], [51] but relies on the reliability of single cell attachment, with examples showing yields from 60% [52] to 80% [53].…”
Section: Regulatory Considerations For 2d and 3d Printing Of Biologicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[118,119] 2D inkjet-printed chitosan patterns have also been employed as structural layer for the fabrication of single-cell arrays. [120] 3D printed chitosan scaffolds have also been loaded with bioactive molecules, to develop an artificial printed architecture for cell adhesion scaffold and surface-mediated drug delivery system. [121] Also, negatively charged polysaccharides have been exploited as structural matrix for artificial tissue constructs, as reported for gels of alginate.…”
Section: Carbohydratesmentioning
confidence: 99%