2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44034-6_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquatic Macroinvertebrates of the Sava River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ) based on mayfly assemblage generally showed that sampling sites are structured first by ecoregion and then by habitat type. For this reason, due to their morphology and water properties ( Lucić et al 2015 ), the large, slow Pannonian lowland rivers (Sava, Drava, Kupa) are separated from the other sampling sites situated in the Dinaric western Balkan ecoregion. SIMPER analysis (Table 5 ) showed that the Pannonian mayfly community consisted of species that prefer epipotamalic sections of rivers, such as Caenis macrura , Procloeon bifidum , Heptagenia sulphurea and Potamanthus luteus ( Buffagni et al 2007 , 2009 , Bauernfeind and Soldán 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ) based on mayfly assemblage generally showed that sampling sites are structured first by ecoregion and then by habitat type. For this reason, due to their morphology and water properties ( Lucić et al 2015 ), the large, slow Pannonian lowland rivers (Sava, Drava, Kupa) are separated from the other sampling sites situated in the Dinaric western Balkan ecoregion. SIMPER analysis (Table 5 ) showed that the Pannonian mayfly community consisted of species that prefer epipotamalic sections of rivers, such as Caenis macrura , Procloeon bifidum , Heptagenia sulphurea and Potamanthus luteus ( Buffagni et al 2007 , 2009 , Bauernfeind and Soldán 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proximity to the Danube as the major source of NIMS and different colonization history could be responsible for observed differences. However, due to limited extent of previous similar studies in Croatian large rivers (Žganec et al, 2009Lajtner and Crnčan, 2011;Lucić et al, 2015), colonization history of the most abundant and widespread NIMS can only partly be reconstructed. Zebra mussel and mud snail were probably introduced to Drava reservoirs shortly after their construction between 1975 and 1989 either by natural (birds) or some human-mediated vectors.…”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Assemblages Non-indigenous Species and Bimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This clearly shows that reservoirs are major source water bodies for this species in Croatian large rivers. However, failure of zebra mussel to establish denser population in the Sava River (few specimens were found in 2011, Lucić et al, 2015) could also be a consequence of some other factors as well, such as dominance of psammopelal and mud covering hard surfaces on the river bottom and severe pollution of the Sava River in the past (Matoničkin et al, 1975). Other NIMS have probably been spreading upstream by ship traffic, while in the Drava River they are spread also by small fishermen's boats or some other vectors (attachment on fisherman's equipment, by birds, mammals, etc.).…”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Assemblages Non-indigenous Species and Bimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many European lowland rivers are exposed to various anthropogenic pressures. They are hydromorphologically altered, including the channelization of the river course and habitat degradation due to the construction of hydroelectric power plants (Lucić et al, 2015;Schwarz, 2012). Rivers are also exposed to various types of pollution of urban, pharmaceutical and agricultural origin (Previšić et al, 2020;Vilenica et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%