2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-015-1018-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aquarium hitchhikers: attached commensals imported with freshwater shrimps via the pet trade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the long history of trade and keeping of tremendously popular freshwater fish and molluscs, the pet trade with freshwater ornamental decapod crustaceans including crayfish, shrimps and crabs has started rather late, in the mid-1990s (Scholtz et al, 2003;Chucholl, 2013;Patoka et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the long history of trade and keeping of tremendously popular freshwater fish and molluscs, the pet trade with freshwater ornamental decapod crustaceans including crayfish, shrimps and crabs has started rather late, in the mid-1990s (Scholtz et al, 2003;Chucholl, 2013;Patoka et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative consequences such as out-competition with native species, disease spread, food web and habitat alternation, and incidental fauna introduction are widely discussed (Duggan, 2010;Gherardi et al, 2011;Chucholl and Wendler, 2016;Patoka et al, 2016a;Souty-Grosset et al, 2016). Although pet trade has been considered one of the most important sources of non-native species (Padilla and Williams, 2004;Duggan, 2010), risk assessment of decapod crustaceans introduced via this pathway had been marginalized for a long time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development and growth of global markets for non‐native species is considered the dominant proximate cause of the increase in biological invasions (Perrings, Williamson, & Dalmazzone, ). The pet trade has been particularly responsible for introductions and, in some cases, subsequent establishment of numerous non‐native aquatic species and can constitute a threat for species in their native areas (Arndt, Gessner, & Raymakers, ; Lodge, Taylor, Holdich, & Skurdal, ; Nunes, Tricarico, Panov, Cardoso, & Katsanevakis, ; Padilla & Williams, ; Patoka et al, ; Rixon, Duggan, Bergeron, Ricciardi, & Macisaac, ). This phenomenon has been brought about by the fact that many people around the world are involved in the keeping of aquatic species for ornamental purposes (Duggan, ; Maceda‐Veiga, Domínguez‐Domínguez, Escribano‐Alacid, & Lyons, ; Padilla & Williams, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the risk assessment, we suggest that at least the following three queries are considered and answered: (i) Are there any symbionts? Nothing is known about the biota associated with Limnopilos crabs, but tiny symbionts such as rotifers and temnocephalidans are known to be transported via the pet trade associated with their decapod hosts [42]; (ii) Are Limnopilos crabs truly freshwater? Limnopilos crabs release free-moving larvae, and these larvae apparently develop in freshwaters, but this assumption must be confirmed; and (iii) Are Limnopilos crabs sensitive or resistant to crayfish plague?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%