2019
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AquaFlux: Rapid, transparent and replicable analyses of plant transpiration

Abstract: Plant transpiration is the largest evaporative flux from most terrestrial ecosystems, playing a dominant role in energy balance, hydrological cycling, ecosystem services and water security (Schlesinger & Jasechko, 2014). Consequently, understanding the mechanisms of plant transpiration and how they relate to plant traits is essential for enhancing agricultural productivity, optimizing land management planning, ecological studies and improving climate modelling. Transpiration rates vary over time and space, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive ecophysiological and geophysical measures were carried out at plot V. Meteorological observations of radiation, wind speed, temperature, precipitation, and relative humidity were recorded (Thayer et al, ). Sap flux density was measured on 6–7 trees per species using Granier method (Granier, ), processed using the R package AquaFlux (Speckman et al, ), and converted into transpiration per leaf area based on previously reported ratios of sapwood area to leaf area (Kaufmann & Troendle, ), following previous studies in this area (Adelman et al, ; Ewers et al, ; Ewers et al, ; Pataki et al, ). Predawn and midday leaf water potentials were averaged for five samples per date and measured using a Scholander‐type pressure chamber (PMS, Corvallis, OR).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive ecophysiological and geophysical measures were carried out at plot V. Meteorological observations of radiation, wind speed, temperature, precipitation, and relative humidity were recorded (Thayer et al, ). Sap flux density was measured on 6–7 trees per species using Granier method (Granier, ), processed using the R package AquaFlux (Speckman et al, ), and converted into transpiration per leaf area based on previously reported ratios of sapwood area to leaf area (Kaufmann & Troendle, ), following previous studies in this area (Adelman et al, ; Ewers et al, ; Ewers et al, ; Pataki et al, ). Predawn and midday leaf water potentials were averaged for five samples per date and measured using a Scholander‐type pressure chamber (PMS, Corvallis, OR).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple sap flow sensors can be deployed, in almost any terrestrial ecosystem, to determine the magnitude and temporal dynamics of transpiration across species, environmental conditions or experimental treatments. All sap flow methods are subject to methodological and scaling issues, which may affect the quantification of absolute water use in some circumstances (Čermák et al, 2004;Köstner et al, 1998;Smith and Allen, 1996;Vandegehuchte and Steppe, 2013). Nevertheless, all methods are suitable for the assessment of the temporal dynamics of transpiration and of its responses to environmental changes or to experimental treatments (Flo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main characteristics of sap flow methods have been reviewed elsewhere (Čermák et al, 2004;Smith and Allen, 1996;Swanson, 1994;Vandegehuchte and Steppe, 2013). Given the already broad scope of the paper, here we only provide a brief methodological overview, without delving into the details of the individual methods.…”
Section: An Overview Of Sap Flow Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations