2012
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aptamers as potential tools for super-resolution microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
154
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
3
154
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Blom et al 2011;Kellner et al 2007;Kittel et al 2006;Lau et al 2012;Muller et al 2012;Opazo et al 2012;Persson et al 2011;Schmidt et al 2008Schmidt et al , 2009Sieber et al 2007;Wagner et al 2012), making a STED microscope a uniquely helpful tool nowadays in cell-biological laboratories (Clausen et al 2013). Furthermore, STED has important applications outside biology, ranging from nanoscale imaging of assemblies of colloidal particles and polymeric structures (Friedemann et al 2011;Harke et al 2008b;Ullal et al 2009Ullal et al , 2011 to solid-state physics .…”
Section: Sted Nanoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Blom et al 2011;Kellner et al 2007;Kittel et al 2006;Lau et al 2012;Muller et al 2012;Opazo et al 2012;Persson et al 2011;Schmidt et al 2008Schmidt et al , 2009Sieber et al 2007;Wagner et al 2012), making a STED microscope a uniquely helpful tool nowadays in cell-biological laboratories (Clausen et al 2013). Furthermore, STED has important applications outside biology, ranging from nanoscale imaging of assemblies of colloidal particles and polymeric structures (Friedemann et al 2011;Harke et al 2008b;Ullal et al 2009Ullal et al , 2011 to solid-state physics .…”
Section: Sted Nanoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, coming along with the increased sensitivity of the nanoscopy approach, greater care has to be taken when labelling cellular samples, especially with respect to unspecific background staining . Artifacts due to, for example, improper fixation in immunolabeling or unspecific binding may not be observed in confocal but may be visible in nanoscopy images, due to the improved spatial resolution in the latter (Opazo et al 2012;Tanaka et al 2010). Also, due to the increased spatial resolution, the term "co-localization" may become invalid, since two objects (especially when labelled via a primary and secondary antibody as in most immunolabeling approaches) cannot occupy the same spot.…”
Section: Conclusion: Coordinate-targeted Versus -Stochasticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While polyclonal antibodies can lead to overlabeling, the large size of the antibody can also lead to underlabeling due to steric hindrance. In practice, determining the labeling efficiency of an antibody is quite challenging and smaller probes such as aptamers and nanobodies have been demonstrated to lead to denser labeling of certain targets and higher spatial resolution in super-resolution images [38,39]. In principle, fluorescent proteins avoid this complication, giving rise to a one-to-one labeling ratio; however, the expression strategy used can cause additional problems.…”
Section: Missed Molecules and Under-countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 Single-chain antibody fragments (nanobodies) against tubulin was engineered to achieve super-resolution imaging of microtubules with a decreased apparent diameter. 58 In parallel, aptamers (short single stranded oligonucleotides ($ 15 kDa, $ 4 nm), as small as nanobodies, can also bene¯t the STED imaging when compared with antibody staining, 59 as seen in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Emerging Small Molecular Labeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%